Measure deployment, strength, exemptions, and privileged coverage accurately. Visualize scoring gaps and improvement priorities instantly. Track stronger access protection with practical metrics for teams.
| Scenario | Total Users | MFA Enabled | Privileged MFA | Phishing Resistant | Exemptions | Estimated Score Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline enterprise rollout | 1000 | 920 | 78/80 | 340 | 12 | Strong |
| Improved passkey adoption | 1000 | 970 | 80/80 | 520 | 4 | Excellent |
| Legacy-heavy environment | 1000 | 710 | 56/80 | 120 | 34 | Weak |
This calculator builds a weighted score from MFA coverage, privileged account protection, phishing-resistant adoption, policy enforcement, recovery readiness, app protection, third-party identity coverage, and authentication method quality. It then subtracts penalties for exemptions, failed prompt rates, and long remembered-device windows.
It estimates how strong your MFA program is across adoption, privileged access, resistance to phishing, enforcement quality, and operational exceptions. A higher score usually means lower authentication risk and better protection maturity.
Compromised privileged accounts create outsized business risk. Because of that, full MFA coverage for administrators, operators, and highly sensitive accounts meaningfully increases the overall security score.
Hardware keys and passkeys resist replay and prompt-based phishing better than weaker methods. The calculator rewards those methods because they lower common attack paths against accounts.
SMS still adds protection, but it is generally more exposed to interception, social engineering, and number-porting attacks. The calculator therefore gives stronger methods a higher quality weight.
An exemption is any account, workflow, or system path allowed to bypass MFA. Temporary break-glass accounts, legacy systems, and unmanaged exceptions should all be tracked because they reduce overall assurance.
Monthly reviews are a solid baseline. Recalculate after major identity changes, new app integrations, administrator turnover, policy changes, or large onboarding waves to catch security drift early.
Yes. The breakdown table, recommendations, CSV export, PDF export, and chart make it useful for control reviews, board summaries, security roadmaps, and program benchmarking discussions.
No. MFA is one important control, not the whole identity strategy. You still need strong device trust, least privilege, monitoring, conditional access, recovery controls, and user awareness.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.