CIA Weathering Index Calculator

Turn oxide data into a trusted CIA score. Choose corrections then compare rocks confidently fast. Download results share tables and guide field sampling decisions.

Calculator

Enter oxide weight percentages (wt%). Use CaO* options if carbonates or apatite may inflate CaO.

Alumina content for the sample.
Total CaO includes silicates plus carbonates/phosphates.
Sodium oxide, often from plagioclase.
Potassium oxide, from K-feldspar or micas.
Used for apatite correction when selected.
CaO* represents silicate CaO only.
Tip: For carbonate-rich samples, avoid using total CaO.

Formula used

The Chemical Index of Alteration (CIA) estimates the relative loss of mobile cations during chemical weathering. It is computed from oxide weight percentages as:

CIA = [ Al2O3 / (Al2O3 + CaO* + Na2O + K2O) ] × 100

How to use

  1. Enter your measured oxide values in wt%.
  2. Select a CaO* method that matches your sample chemistry.
  3. Click Calculate to view CIA, CIW, and interpretation.
  4. Use the download buttons to export results for lab notes.
  5. Compare samples consistently using the same correction choice.

Why CIA matters for weathering interpretation

Chemical Index of Alteration (CIA) summarizes how strongly a rock or sediment has been chemically transformed. It compares relatively immobile Al2O3 to mobile bases CaO*, Na2O, and K2O. Fresh feldspar rich materials often plot near 45–55, while intensely leached profiles can exceed 85. Because CIA is unitless and percentage scaled, it supports quick screening across many samples. In practice, CIA responds to climate, drainage, and residence time, so interpret it relative to parent composition. Plotting CIA on A–CN–K diagrams can highlight feldspar breakdown and clay formation pathways, and it helps compare horizons within a soil profile over time.

Choosing CaO* for silicate-only calcium

Total CaO can be inflated by carbonates or apatite, pushing CIA artificially low. This calculator provides options to estimate CaO* as min(CaO, Na2O), to correct CaO using P2O5 for apatite, to use total CaO when appropriate, or to enter a custom CaO* from petrographic or sequential extraction work. Consistency of the chosen correction is essential for comparative studies.

Reading CIA alongside CIW and context

CIW excludes K2O and is useful when potassium metasomatism or variable K-feldspar abundance is suspected. Compare CIA and CIW together: a high CIW with a moderate CIA may indicate potassium addition, while both high values usually reflect strong depletion of bases. Always pair indices with mineralogy, grain size, and depositional setting for reliable interpretation.

Quality checks for oxide inputs

Use normalized major oxides reported in weight percent from XRF, ICP, or wet chemistry. Verify totals are reasonable and that Al2O3, CaO, Na2O, and K2O are nonnegative. If carbonate is present, avoid the “use total CaO” option unless CaO has already been corrected. Document analytical uncertainty; small errors in low-oxide samples can shift CIA by several points.

Practical workflow for reporting results

Enter the oxides, select a CaO* method, then calculate CIA and CIW. Record the method in your report, export CSV for spreadsheets, and export PDF for field or lab notebooks. For multi-sample projects, apply the same settings and flag outliers for rechecking. Use CIA as an index, not a standalone diagnosis, and interpret trends across stratigraphy or profiles.

FAQs

What does CaO* represent in the calculation?

CaO* is the calcium oxide attributed to silicate minerals only. It excludes carbonate and apatite calcium that does not track feldspar breakdown. Using CaO* helps prevent CIA from being biased low in carbonate-rich or phosphate-rich samples.

Should I enter molar or weight percentages?

Enter oxide values as weight percent (wt%), matching typical laboratory reports. CIA is ideally computed from molar proportions, but wt% inputs provide a practical, consistent approximation for screening when applied uniformly across a dataset.

How should I interpret CIA values above 80?

Values above about 80 usually indicate advanced chemical weathering with strong depletion of Ca, Na, and K relative to Al. Interpret with mineralogy and setting, because intense leaching, recycled sediment, or clay-rich sources can also raise CIA.

Why can carbonates make CIA look lower?

Carbonate minerals add CaO without adding Al2O3, increasing the denominator and decreasing CIA. If carbonates are present, select a CaO* correction method or supply a custom CaO* value derived from petrography or geochemical correction.

When is CIW more useful than CIA?

CIW excludes K2O, so it is useful where potassium has been added or removed independently, such as K-metasomatism, variable mica content, or diagenetic K-fixation. Comparing CIA and CIW can highlight K-related overprints.

My oxide total is not 100%. What should I do?

If totals differ due to loss on ignition or analytical reporting, normalize major oxides to 100% before calculating, or keep the same reporting style for all samples. Consistency matters more than the exact total for comparative trends.

Example data table

Sample Al2O3 CaO Na2O K2O P2O5 Example CIA*
Granite-like 14.50 2.10 3.40 4.70 0.15 58.70
Basalt-like 15.00 10.50 2.60 0.80 0.20 71.43
Shale-like 18.00 1.20 1.00 3.20 0.10 77.59

*Example CIA uses the min(CaO, Na2O) CaO* estimate for consistency.

Related Calculators

Partition Coefficient CalculatorSediment Porosity CalculatorBulk Density CalculatorHydraulic Conductivity CalculatorGroundwater Velocity CalculatorOxygen Isotope CalculatorSilica Saturation CalculatorGeochemical Index CalculatorFugacity Coefficient CalculatorGas Solubility Calculator

Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.