Enter suspension and particle data
The form uses a 3-column layout on large screens, 2 columns on smaller screens, and 1 column on mobile screens.
Example data table
This example uses the default inputs shown in the form.
| Diameter | Ionic strength | Zeta potential | Shear rate | Time | Debye length | Aggregate diameter | Regime |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80 nm | 10 mM | -35 mV | 150 s⁻¹ | 30 min | 3.040 nm | 2,378.011 nm | Rapid aggregate growth |
Formula used
This tool combines Brownian and shear-induced collision kernels, then scales the total collision frequency using a simplified DLVO-style stability barrier. The Brownian kernel is: βB = 8kBT / 3μ. The shear kernel for equal spheres is: βS = (4/3)γ(2a)3.
Ionic strength sets the Debye length with an aqueous approximation: λD(nm) ≈ 0.304 √[(εr/78.5)(T/298.15)] / √I, where I is in mol/L. Shorter Debye length compresses the electric double layer and reduces repulsive stabilization.
Interaction energy is estimated from van der Waals attraction, electrostatic repulsion, and an optional steric term. The total barrier is converted into a stability ratio: W ≈ exp(ΔV / kBT). The effective collision kernel becomes: βeff = α(βB + βS)(1 + 4φ) / W.
Particle number concentration follows the monodisperse Smoluchowski solution: N(t) = N0 / [1 + βeffN0t]. Mean particles per cluster are approximated by N0/N(t), and aggregate diameter is estimated from a fractal scaling law: dagg = dp(N0/N(t))1/Df.
These relations are practical engineering approximations. They are best for screening trends, comparing formulations, and identifying stability windows before deeper experimental work.
How to use this calculator
- Enter the primary nanoparticle diameter and initial particle concentration.
- Set the suspension conditions: volume fraction, temperature, and viscosity.
- Provide ionic strength, zeta potential, Hamaker constant, and relative permittivity.
- Add process-specific mixing information through the shear rate.
- Choose a sticking efficiency and fractal dimension for your material system.
- Set minimum gap distance and optional steric layer thickness.
- Enter the process time, then click Calculate Agglomeration.
- Read the summary metrics, examine both graphs, and export the report using CSV or PDF if needed.
Frequently asked questions
1) What does the stability ratio mean?
It estimates how strongly repulsive forces slow aggregation. A value near 1 suggests fast agglomeration. Larger values indicate collisions are less likely to stick because of an energy barrier.
2) Why does ionic strength matter so much?
Higher ionic strength compresses the electric double layer, reducing electrostatic repulsion. That usually lowers colloidal stability and can accelerate agglomeration, especially when van der Waals attraction is already strong.
3) What is the role of zeta potential?
Zeta potential is a practical indicator of electrostatic stabilization. Higher magnitude values, positive or negative, often increase repulsive interaction and raise the estimated energy barrier against agglomeration.
4) Why include both Brownian and shear kernels?
Nanoparticles collide from thermal motion and from velocity gradients in mixing or flow. Including both kernels helps the model capture still systems, stirred systems, and intermediate processing conditions.
5) What does fractal dimension change?
Fractal dimension translates cluster population growth into aggregate size. Lower values represent looser, more open aggregates, while higher values represent denser clusters with slower diameter expansion for the same number of particles.
6) When should I use steric thickness?
Use it when polymers, surfactants, or ligands create a protective shell around particles. The steric term can reduce close approach and increase the apparent barrier to agglomeration.
7) Is this suitable for concentrated slurries?
It can support quick screening, but concentrated systems may need richer hydrodynamic, many-body, and breakage models. Use the results as trend guidance rather than a final design basis.
8) Can I use this for non-aqueous dispersions?
Yes, but update viscosity and relative permittivity carefully. The Debye approximation and electrostatic term are simplified, so non-aqueous systems may still require calibration against experimental stability data.