Calculator Inputs
Example Data Table
| Site | Physical | Transition | Emissions | Water | Supply | Readiness | Revenue at Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regional Manufacturing Hub | 72 | 64 | 58 | 66 | 61 | 43 | 18% |
| Coastal Distribution Center | 81 | 49 | 45 | 74 | 57 | 52 | 22% |
| Urban Office Campus | 34 | 56 | 39 | 28 | 33 | 71 | 9% |
Formula Used
1. Normalize weights: Normalized Weight = Input Weight / Total Weight
2. Build dimension scores: Each dimension combines base score, scenario stress, and business modifiers such as carbon price, insurance buffer, and time horizon.
3. Enterprise Heat Score: Sum of each Dimension Score × Normalized Weight
4. Business Impact Score: (Enterprise Heat Score × 0.65) + (Revenue at Risk × 0.35)
5. Resilience Score: 100 − [(Readiness Gap × 0.55) + (Supply Vulnerability × 0.20) + (Physical Risk × 0.25)]
6. Priority Index: (Business Impact Score × 0.60) + ((100 − Resilience Score) × 0.40)
Higher scores indicate more urgent climate exposure and a stronger need for mitigation, adaptation, capital planning, and governance action.
How to Use This Calculator
- Enter a site, business unit, or asset name.
- Score climate drivers from 0 to 100.
- Set weights to reflect material enterprise priorities.
- Adjust scenario multiplier, carbon price, and time horizon.
- Click Generate Heatmap to produce the results above the form.
- Review the heatmap, priority band, and action message.
- Export the result as CSV or PDF for reporting.
FAQs
1. What does this calculator measure?
It measures enterprise climate exposure by combining physical, transition, emissions, water, supply chain, and readiness indicators into one heatmap-driven priority score.
2. Why use weights?
Weights let you reflect what matters most. A manufacturer may emphasize physical and water risk, while a service company may prioritize transition exposure.
3. What is the readiness gap?
The readiness gap equals 100 minus adaptation readiness. Lower readiness creates a larger gap and usually increases enterprise heat and priority levels.
4. How should I choose the scenario multiplier?
Use a higher multiplier for more severe climate pathways or stress tests. Use a lower value for conservative planning assumptions.
5. Can this support ESG reporting?
Yes. It helps prioritize sites, document assumptions, and summarize heatmap outputs for internal governance, transition planning, and climate-risk discussions.
6. Is the result a regulatory grade?
No. It is a planning tool. Formal disclosure and assurance should still use your approved methodology, controls, and reporting standards.
7. What does revenue at risk change?
It increases the business impact portion of the model. Sites with similar hazards can rank differently when financial exposure differs.
8. When should I export CSV or PDF?
Export after generating results if you need documentation for meetings, risk reviews, board packs, climate workshops, or cross-functional planning sessions.