Model single or dual anchors with realistic arrest forces today using inputs. Get clear loads per worker, per leg, plus margins and notes instantly.
| Scenario | Weight | Workers | Fall | Decel | Config | Angle | Peak | Safety | Per-anchor (approx) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Planning check | 100 kg | 1 | 2.0 m | 1.0 m | Single | — | 1.30 | 2.0 | ~3.83 kN peak, ~7.66 kN design |
| Two-point bridle | 220 lb | 1 | 6 ft | 3 ft | Two-point | 90° | 1.30 | 2.0 | ~1,187 lbf per anchor peak, ~2,374 lbf design |
| Multiple workers | 90 kg | 3 | 1.5 m | 1.0 m | Two-point | 60° | 1.35 | 2.5 | Higher per anchor; set simultaneity carefully |
Examples are illustrative. Enter your real jobsite assumptions for planning.
This calculator uses a simple energy balance to estimate arrest force. The worker’s weight force is W = m·g. During arrest, the fall energy is dissipated over the deceleration distance.
Reality can differ due to equipment characteristics, harness fit, slack, elasticity, and dynamics. Use this estimator for planning and discussions, not as a stamped design.
This tool estimates the peak load that an anchorage may see during a fall arrest event using a simplified energy approach. It converts worker weight into force and combines fall distance with deceleration distance to approximate arrest forces for planning and documentation.
Most jobsite scenarios use worker weights from 70–140 kg (155–310 lb). Free-fall distance is often between 0.6–2.0 m (2–6 ft) depending on slack and connection method. Deceleration distance commonly falls around 0.9–1.2 m (3–4 ft) when energy absorbers are engaged.
The ratio of fall distance to deceleration distance drives force growth. If fall distance equals deceleration distance, the average arrest force is roughly 2× body-weight force. If fall distance is twice the deceleration distance, the average is roughly 3×.
Real systems do not load perfectly smoothly. Harness stretch, line elongation, and absorber behavior can create a peak higher than the average. The peak factor lets you model that effect (for example 1.2–1.5), producing a more conservative peak estimate for comparing to component ratings.
When a load is shared by two legs, each anchor can see more than half the total if the included angle opens up. At 60° included angle, the multiplier is close to 1.15 per anchor. At 120°, it rises toward 2.0. Keeping the angle tighter reduces amplification and improves predictability.
Shared anchors are sometimes used for access systems, temporary lifelines, or sequential work zones. The simultaneity factor helps represent realistic overlap: 1.0 assumes every worker loads at once; 0.5 assumes roughly half. Document the basis for the factor.
The design load multiplies the estimated peak by a safety factor so you can plan with margin. A factor of 2.0 is a common planning choice, while higher factors may be used when inputs are uncertain or when anchor condition, geometry, or installation quality vary across the site.
Record the connection type, fall clearance assumptions, included angle for bridles, and the selected peak and safety factors. Export the CSV or PDF for the job file, then confirm final anchorage selections using applicable standards, manufacturer guidance, and a competent engineering review.
Use results to support planning, discussions, and consistent recordkeeping.
No. It is a simplified estimator for planning and documentation. Always confirm anchorage ratings, installation requirements, and governing standards with qualified safety and engineering professionals.
Use the best available stopping distance for your system, including absorber deployment and realistic stretch. If uncertain, use a conservative value (smaller distance increases force).
As the included angle opens, each leg must carry more tension to provide the same vertical support. This increases per-anchor load compared with a tight, vertical configuration.
Peak factor depends on system dynamics. Many planning checks use 1.2–1.5. Use manufacturer data where available and apply a higher factor when uncertainty or shock loading is possible.
Enter the connected worker count and apply a simultaneity factor to reflect realistic overlap. If workers could load together, set the factor near 1.0.
Not explicitly. Swing falls can increase hazards and change loading direction. Keep geometry conservative, reduce slack, and evaluate lateral forces and clearance using appropriate methods.
This version targets fall arrest planning. Hoisting and rigging have different dynamics and code requirements. Use a purpose-built lifting analysis and follow equipment and regulatory guidance.
Always verify designs with qualified safety professionals before use.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.