Model approach speed and displacement with confidence. Adjust eccentricity, added mass, softness, and configuration factors. Download CSV or PDF summaries for easy documentation project.
This calculator applies a coefficient-based berthing energy model used in preliminary fender design checks.
| Scenario | Displacement (t) | Velocity (m/s) | Ce | Cm | Cs | Cc | SF | Efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coastal cargo berth | 18,000 | 0.10 | 1.00 | 1.70 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 1.15 | 0.85 |
| Container terminal | 65,000 | 0.12 | 1.05 | 1.80 | 0.95 | 1.05 | 1.25 | 0.80 |
| Tanker berth | 120,000 | 0.08 | 1.10 | 1.90 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 1.30 | 0.75 |
Berthing energy is the work that a fender system must absorb when a vessel contacts the berth. In marine and coastal construction, this value supports preliminary fender selection, spacing decisions, and risk screening. Higher energies typically require larger fenders, stronger fixings, and careful structural detailing at the berth face.
Start with reliable displacement for the expected berthing condition (ballast, part‑load, or fully loaded). Approach velocity should reflect pilotage procedures, local current and wind exposure, and any operational speed limits. Coefficients should come from design guidance, comparable terminals, or project standards, then documented for traceability.
Energy scales with the square of velocity, so small speed changes can dominate results. Controlled berthing often falls around 0.05–0.20 m/s, while harsher sites, tight basins, or limited tug assistance may justify conservative values. Use scenario testing in the form to compare “normal” and “adverse” operations transparently.
The calculator converts displacement from tonnes to kilograms, then applies an added mass factor (Cm) to represent entrained water moving with the hull. For many vessels, Cm can range roughly 1.5–2.0. This effective mass drives kinetic energy and is a practical way to capture hydrodynamic amplification without complex modelling.
Eccentricity (Ce) increases energy when contact is offset and rotational effects occur. Softness (Cs) reduces energy when compliance and damping dissipate motion. Configuration (Cc) adjusts for berth arrangement, approach angle, and operational layout. Together, these factors help align the simplified energy model with real berthing behaviour.
A safety factor is commonly applied to cover uncertainties in velocity, vessel mass, coefficient selection, and operational variability. Values near 1.0 suit well‑controlled conditions with strong data, while 1.2–1.5 can be appropriate where exposure is higher or information is limited. Record the rationale in your project files.
The design berthing energy (in Joules and kN·m) is a target for the fender system to absorb. The calculator also estimates required rated fender energy by dividing by efficiency, recognizing that not all theoretical energy is absorbed as rated performance. Always verify final selection against manufacturer curves and allowable reaction loads.
Documenting assumptions is as important as the number itself. Use the CSV export for quick comparison across scenarios, and the PDF export for approvals and design records. Check units, confirm inputs, and review sensitivity to velocity and coefficients. Consistent reporting reduces disputes during procurement and construction handover.
Use the displacement for the most demanding expected berthing condition, often fully loaded or a defined design case. If operations vary, run multiple scenarios and retain the governing case for design documentation.
Because kinetic energy is proportional to V². Doubling approach velocity increases energy by four times. Even small speed changes can outweigh coefficient adjustments, so choose velocity carefully and justify it with operational controls.
Added mass accounts for water moving with the vessel during lateral motion. It increases effective mass and therefore kinetic energy. Typical preliminary values can be around 1.5–2.0, but use project guidance when available.
Ce reflects off‑center contact and rotational effects at the berth face. Use design guidance, comparable berth layouts, and vessel characteristics. If uncertain, run a conservative Ce and document the assumption clearly.
Efficiency represents the usable portion of design energy absorbed as rated performance. It helps translate theoretical energy into a practical rated energy target. Use manufacturer information and consider installation, aging, and operational conditions.
This tool supports preliminary design and scenario screening. Final design should confirm coefficients, approach conditions, fender performance, and berth structural capacity using applicable standards, manufacturer curves, and project engineering review.
Exports improve auditability. CSV is useful for comparing cases and creating a design register. PDF is convenient for approvals, submittals, and handover records, keeping inputs and results tied to a dated report.
Safer berthing starts with disciplined inputs and checks always.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.