Turn site conditions into a clear dust compliance score for every shift. Compare measured PM10 to limits, then choose controls that work best now.
| Scenario | Active Area (m²) | Wind (m/s) | Vehicles/hr | Moisture (%) | Controls | Measured PM10 | Limit | Typical Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Routine grading | 900 | 4 | 25 | 12 | Watering, speed control | 110 | 150 | Strong score, likely pass |
| Dry haul road | 1200 | 7 | 70 | 6 | Watering, sweeping, wheel wash | 160 | 150 | Moderate score, improve controls |
| Heavy earthwork | 2000 | 9 | 90 | 4 | Watering, suppressant, wind fencing | 210 | 150 | Poor score, high noncompliance risk |
This tool estimates a Dust Potential Index and converts it into a score. It combines site conditions, distance to receptors, and control effectiveness.
DPI_base = (A_active / 1000) × F_activity × F_soil × F_wind × F_traffic × F_moisture × F_distance
Eff_combined = 1 − Π(1 − Eff_i)
DPI_controlled = DPI_base × (1 − Eff_combined)
RiskScore = clamp(DPI_controlled × 15, 0, 100)
MonitorScore = clamp((PM10_limit / PM10_measured) × 100, 0, 200)
OverallScore = 0.60 × (100 − RiskScore) + 0.40 × clamp(MonitorScore, 0, 100)
Fugitive dust can reduce visibility, trigger complaints, and create health risk for workers and neighbors. Many permits require documented controls and corrective actions when particulate levels rise. This calculator helps you turn field observations into a consistent daily score you can track and explain.
The overall score blends a planning-based risk estimate with optional monitoring data. Risk rises with larger disturbed area, higher activity intensity, dry surfaces, strong winds, and frequent vehicle movement. Risk falls when the nearest receptor is farther away and when effective controls are applied.
PM10 is commonly monitored on construction projects because it responds quickly to grading, hauling, and track-out. If you enter a measured PM10 value and your project limit, the calculator flags pass or fail and adds a monitoring score. Use the averaging period that matches your requirement.
Sites often see dust spikes when wind exceeds about 8 m/s, when moisture falls below 8%, or when haul traffic exceeds roughly 50 passes per hour on unpaved routes. Those thresholds are practical “action points” used in daily plans, but your project may use different triggers based on location and permit language.
Watering and misting reduce emissions quickly, but timing and coverage matter. Track-out controls and sweeping reduce off-site migration, especially near public roads. Barriers help on windy days, while suppressants can extend control between watering cycles. Select only measures you will actively maintain.
Auditors usually look for evidence: watering logs, speed limit enforcement, equipment checks, and photos of stabilized areas. Add notes in the form to record schedules, nozzle settings, or inspection findings. Export CSV or PDF for daily reports, toolbox talks, and permit binders.
A moderate rating suggests conditions are trending toward exceedance, so increase control frequency, reduce vehicle speeds, or limit exposed work. A poor rating indicates high likelihood of complaint or noncompliance. Consider pausing dust-generating activities during peak wind and stabilizing inactive areas.
Track results by shift and compare with monitoring outcomes. If measured PM10 stays low, you may optimize watering intervals and reduce waste. If monitoring fails, add controls, tighten traffic rules, and re-score after changes. Over time, the score becomes a simple KPI for dust performance.
No. It is a decision-support tool that helps standardize daily assessments. Your permit terms and local standards control, and you should rely on approved monitoring methods and documented procedures.
You can still use the risk-based score from site conditions and selected controls. Record observations in the notes and treat higher risk ratings as triggers to strengthen controls.
The calculator is structured around PM10 because it responds strongly to dust sources. You may enter PM2.5 as “measured” data, but interpret results cautiously and align with your project requirements.
Controls are combined multiplicatively to avoid double-counting overlap. Each measure reduces the remaining emissions after the previous measure, producing a realistic combined effectiveness estimate.
Update at least once per shift and whenever conditions change, such as wind increases, traffic surges, or watering stops. Frequent updates help catch emerging risks before exceedances occur.
For active earthwork, a common starting set is watering or misting plus speed control, with track-out management near public roads. Add sweeping, barriers, or suppressants when wind and traffic rise.
Distance reduces exposure and deposition at sensitive locations. Closer receptors generally require tighter control, more frequent inspection, and faster corrective action when monitoring or complaints indicate impact.
Always verify limits with your local environmental authority today.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.