Plan every lift with measured angles, ratings, and inspection evidence on site. Turn checklist findings into a clear score, schedule, and report for crews.
| Scenario | Load (t) | Legs | Angle | Sling WLL/leg (t) | Per-leg tension (t) | Score | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Two-leg bridle, moderate angle, all checks OK | 6.5 | 2 | 60° (from horizontal) | 5.0 | 3.75 | 100% | PASS |
| Small angle increases tension, one critical defect | 6.5 | 2 | 30° (from horizontal) | 5.0 | 6.50 | 80% | FAIL |
| Extreme environment shortens interval, overdue date | 4.0 | 4 | 70° (from horizontal) | 2.0 | 1.06 | 95% | FAIL |
This tool estimates rigging tension for planning and inspection screening. Always follow your local regulations, manufacturer limits, and approved lift plans.
Inspect routinely, calculate conservatively, and lift only when compliant.
Lifting and hoisting incidents often start with small defects and optimistic assumptions. This calculator combines a practical checklist score with capacity screening so crews can confirm readiness before the hook leaves the ground. Use it as a pre-lift decision aid, not a substitute for manufacturer limits, local rules, or an approved lift plan.
The checklist begins at 100% and subtracts weighted points for each unchecked item. Higher-weight items reflect higher consequence and likelihood. Any critical item left unchecked forces a fail decision because defects like a damaged hook latch, compromised slings, or ineffective brakes can escalate quickly under dynamic loading.
Angle is a measurable driver of rigging demand. With two legs and a 6.5 t load, tension per leg is about 3.75 t at 60° from horizontal (since sin60° is 0.866). The same lift at 30° becomes about 6.5 t per leg, often exceeding WLL even when the load weight stays unchanged.
To promote conservative decisions, the calculator applies a user-defined safety factor to minimum required capacities. For example, a 1.25 factor means the sling leg, hardware, hoist limit, and equipment rating should each exceed 125% of demand. This helps manage uncertainty from load estimates, wear, and operational variability.
Inspection scheduling is risk-based. A base 30-day interval becomes 23 days in harsh service (30 × 0.75) and 15 days in extreme service (30 × 0.50). Use harsh for dust, chemicals, marine exposure, or frequent shock loading. Use extreme for continuous corrosion or severe abuse.
Administrative controls matter. A competent person confirmation, visible tag/ID, and accessible certificates turn inspection activity into traceable compliance. If any of these are missing, the calculator flags an administrative fail. That protects crews from “unknown condition” gear and supports audits and incident investigations.
Utilization ratios compare demand to limits. Ratios below 1.000 indicate the input limits exceed the calculated demand. Ratios approaching 0.90 should prompt extra caution: verify units, confirm angle measurement method, re-check load weight, and consider increasing WLL or reducing angle severity with spreader beams.
Use the result panel as a brief lift gate: PASS supports proceeding when controls remain unchanged; FAIL requires correction before lifting. Export CSV for daily logs and trend reviews, and export PDF for lift packets. Consistent records improve predictive maintenance and help standardize safe lift decisions across teams.
Use consistent units for every capacity and the load. This calculator’s example uses tonnes. If you use kilograms or pounds, keep everything in that same unit system.
Select the option that matches how your crew measures angle on site. Many rigging charts quote sling angles from horizontal. If your inclinometer reads from vertical, choose that reference.
A lift can fail due to sling tension at low angles, low WLL hardware, overdue inspections, missing records, or critical defects. Rated capacity alone does not confirm rigging integrity.
No. It is a static planning estimate based on angle geometry. Shock loading, side loading, snatch picks, and travel can increase real forces, so keep conservative margins.
Use your site’s lifting procedure or engineered lift plan. Many teams apply 1.10 to 1.50 depending on lift criticality, uncertainty, and inspection confidence.
Enter the governing hoist limit you are using for the planned configuration. If you have a charted line pull by reeving, use that limit as the hoist capacity input.
Yes. Run the calculation, then download CSV or PDF. Keep the files with your lift plan, daily inspection log, and any defect correction records.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.