Plan pest work with transparent cost inputs for every site. Adjust visits, labor, and sealing. Share estimates with teams using clean export files today.
| Scenario | Area | Plan | Frequency | Duration | Devices | Exclusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Warehouse perimeter | 15,000 ft² | Standard | Monthly | 3 months | 8 monitors, 10 stations | 40 units |
| Site office block | 2,500 ft² | Inspection only | One-time | 1 month | 2 monitors, 2 stations | 8 units |
| Industrial yard | 1,200 m² | Intensive | Bi-weekly | 4 months | 14 monitors, 20 stations | 90 units |
Use the examples to sanity-check inputs before exporting estimates.
The estimate combines area-driven service pricing with labor, devices, exclusion work, and add-ons. Rates scale by building type, infestation level, and plan intensity.
Active sites concentrate food waste, standing water, and sheltered voids behind temporary works. Open service penetrations, cable trays, and poorly sealed slab edges create direct access routes. Early control reduces rework, contamination risks, and schedule disruption around fit-out and commissioning.
Total cost typically combines mobilization, area-based service effort, labor hours, devices, and exclusion sealing. Larger areas raise inspection time and treatment coverage. Higher infestation levels increase monitoring density and follow-up visits. Intensive plans add time for perimeter tracking, hotspot mapping, and corrective actions.
Labor rates vary by region and required safety access permits. Monitoring device counts often scale with storage zones, waste collection points, and dock doors. Bait station quantities commonly rise where perimeter fencing has gaps or vegetation lines are dense. Exclusion length represents sealing of openings, joint gaps, and utility entries.
One-time inspections are useful before handover or after a spike in activity. Monthly programs suit stable projects, while bi-weekly or weekly visits help when waste output is high. Longer durations allow trend tracking and reduce rebound infestations after initial knockdown treatments. The calculator reports cost per visit for easier package comparisons.
The CSV export supports bill-of-quantities style reviews, while the PDF summary is suitable for approvals. Keep documentation and compliance fees visible for audit trails. Use contingency to cover access delays, lift requirements, or unexpected sealing scope. Re-run scenarios to justify value-engineering decisions without losing traceability.
Use the combined footprint of zones receiving service. If only perimeter and waste areas are treated, enter that subset area to avoid overestimating recurring coverage.
Inspection suits condition surveys and reporting. Standard fits routine control. Intensive is best for persistent activity, high-risk storage, or repeated sightings that require tighter monitoring and follow-up.
Many projects purchase devices once and service them repeatedly. If your contractor rents devices, keep unit costs included. For purchased devices, set unit cost and keep counts realistic for your site layout.
It is the estimated linear quantity of gaps, penetrations, and edges needing sealing. Include door sweeps, pipe entries, slab joints, and temporary openings that will remain exposed during works.
Add contingency when access is uncertain, night work is required, or sealing scope may grow after inspection. It helps protect budgets from variations without inflating base rates.
The tool divides the estimated total by the total number of planned visits. This normalizes different frequencies and durations so you can compare packages using a consistent unit metric.
Yes. CSV is useful for internal review and cost breakdowns. PDF provides a concise summary for approvals. Always verify local regulations, safety requirements, and site rules before final submission.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.