Sheet Pile Embedment Calculator

Plan temporary or permanent walls with clear inputs. Adjust passive factors and optional water conditions. Download results, share assumptions, and refine field decisions fast.

Inputs
Choose units, then enter soil and loading values.
Fields marked * are required.

Switching units does not auto-convert values.
Enter a positive excavation depth.
Uniform surface surcharge behind the wall.
Used for Rankine Ka and Kp (level backfill).
Total/working unit weight above the dredge line.
Use γ′ ≈ γsat − γw when saturated.
Kp′ = Kp / FS. Typical: 1.25–2.0.
Allowance often added to reduce deflection.
Used to estimate required section modulus.
Reset

Formula used

This tool uses Rankine earth pressure theory for a level backfill: Ka = (1 − sinφ)/(1 + sinφ), Kp = (1 + sinφ)/(1 − sinφ).

Passive resistance is reduced for safety: Kp′ = Kp / FS.

A simplified cantilever equilibrium is then formed by summing moments about the dredge line: ΣM = 0, which leads to a cubic equation in embedment depth D. The calculator solves this cubic numerically and then applies your embedment increase.

Important: This is a simplified estimate and does not replace project-specific geotechnical design.

How to use this calculator

  1. Select your units and enter excavation depth H.
  2. Enter surcharge q and friction angle φ.
  3. Provide unit weight γ and effective unit weight γ′.
  4. Choose a passive safety factor and embedment increase percentage.
  5. Click calculate, then download results as CSV or PDF.

Example data table

Case H (m) q (kN/m²) φ (°) γ (kN/m³) γ′ (kN/m³) FS D (with increase) (m) Mmax (kN·m/m)
Sample 4.0 10.0 32 18.0 9.0 1.50 9.19 338.5
The sample is included for reference and sanity-checking.
Assumptions and limits

Practical notes for sheet pile embedment planning

1) Why embedment depth controls performance

Embedment provides passive resistance below the dredge line, balancing active pressures above. In many temporary excavations, preliminary embedment often falls near 0.7H to 1.3H, depending on soil strength, water, and surcharge. A small increase in depth can noticeably reduce rotation, lowering bending demand and improving serviceability.

2) Input ranges commonly seen on projects

For granular backfill, friction angle φ frequently ranges from 28° to 38°. Total unit weight γ is often 17–20 kN/m³ (or 105–125 pcf). Typical uniform surcharge values used for planning are 5–20 kN/m² (or 100–400 psf) when adjacent traffic or storage is possible.

3) Earth pressure coefficients you can sanity-check

Using Rankine theory for level backfill, approximate values are: φ=30° → Ka≈0.33, Kp≈3.00; φ=35° → Ka≈0.27, Kp≈3.69; φ=40° → Ka≈0.22, Kp≈4.60. If your input φ is low, expect higher active pressure and deeper embedment.

4) How surcharge changes demand

A uniform surcharge adds a rectangular lateral pressure Ka·q along the retained height. This increases both total thrust and bending moment even when excavation depth remains constant. When the work zone may be loaded later, model the surcharge conservatively and compare results with and without it.

5) Water and effective unit weight

Below the water table, effective or submerged unit weight γ′ better represents soil resistance. A practical estimate is γ′ ≈ γsat − γw, often 8–11 kN/m³ (or 50–70 pcf) for sands. Lower γ′ reduces passive resistance, usually increasing required embedment.

6) Passive safety factor and conservatism

Field conditions, disturbance, and construction tolerances can reduce mobilized passive pressure. This calculator applies Kp′ = Kp/FS. Values near 1.25 may suit controlled conditions, while 1.5–2.0 is common when variability is expected. Increasing FS generally increases embedment and reduces sensitivity to uncertainty.

7) Interpreting moment and section demand

Maximum moment is a key driver for selecting a sheet section. If you provide allowable bending stress, the tool estimates required section modulus from S = M/σallow. For early-stage planning, compare several input cases (low/high φ, with/without surcharge) to understand the controlling scenario.

8) Quality checks before you rely on the result

Confirm backfill slope, staged excavation, and any tiebacks or struts, since they can change behavior. Verify units, especially when switching between metric and imperial. Use the example row as a quick reasonableness check, then document assumptions with the CSV or PDF for review.


FAQs

1) What wall type does this embedment method represent?

It represents a simplified cantilever sheet pile estimate for level backfill. It is useful for preliminary sizing, but final design should reflect project staging, support conditions, and verified soil parameters.

2) Should I use total or effective unit weight for γ and γ′?

Use total unit weight above the dredge line where soil is not submerged. Use effective or submerged unit weight for the embedment zone when groundwater is present, because buoyancy reduces resistance.

3) What does the passive safety factor change?

The factor reduces passive resistance by lowering Kp to Kp′. Higher values add conservatism, typically increasing embedment and lowering the risk of overestimating passive support under imperfect field conditions.

4) Why is an embedment increase percentage included?

Designers often add depth to improve stiffness and reduce deflection. The increase is an allowance beyond the theoretical equilibrium depth, supporting constructability and serviceability when tolerances, soil variability, or water effects are uncertain.

5) How should I select allowable bending stress?

Use the value consistent with your material grade, corrosion allowance, and design approach. If you only need embedment, enter a representative stress; if selecting a section, match the value to your structural checks and specifications.

6) Does this account for wall friction or sloping ground?

No. The coefficients are based on a level backfill and no wall friction. Sloping ground, surcharges near the edge, and wall-soil interface friction can change pressures and should be handled with a project-specific method.

7) Why might the calculated depth differ from field experience?

Differences can come from layered soils, partial saturation, construction sequence, driving disturbance, or support systems. Use this as a planning baseline, then refine with geotechnical inputs, groundwater levels, and an analysis method aligned with the project’s risk profile.

Related Calculators

Wave steepness calculatorWave energy calculatorWave power calculatorShoaling coefficient calculatorRefraction coefficient calculatorWave setup calculatorWave runup calculatorOvertopping discharge calculatorIribarren number calculatorSurf similarity calculator

Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.