Choose your estimate type and enter data below. Instant bounds appear with helpful method notes. Download a report, share a table, stay accurate always.
This tool computes 90% intervals (α = 0.10). Choose an estimate type, fill inputs, then submit.
Sample scenarios and typical outputs (rounded). Values may differ slightly due to rounding and method choice.
| Scenario | Inputs | Center | 90% CI | Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (unknown σ) | x̄=52.3, s=10.1, n=40 | 52.3 | [~49.5, ~55.1] | t interval |
| Proportion | x=37, n=50 | ~0.73 | [~0.62, ~0.82] | Wilson |
| Δ means | x̄1=14.2,s1=3.1,n1=25; x̄2=12.7,s2=2.9,n2=28 | 1.5 | [~0.2, ~2.8] | Welch |
If you repeated sampling many times, about 90% of the constructed intervals would contain the true parameter. It is not a probability statement about one fixed interval.
A two-sided 90% interval leaves 10% total error outside the bounds, split as 5% in each tail. The critical value is computed from that tail probability.
Use a t interval when the population standard deviation is unknown and you estimate variability with the sample standard deviation. It is especially appropriate for small to moderate sample sizes.
Wilson intervals behave better than the basic normal method when n is small or the success rate is near 0 or 1. They reduce boundary issues and improve coverage.
Welch’s method estimates the standard error without assuming equal variances. It also uses an adjusted degrees-of-freedom formula to compute a more reliable critical value.
For means and differences, negative bounds are possible and often valid. For single proportions, this calculator clamps Wilson bounds to the [0,1] range for interpretability.
State the estimate, the 90% interval, and the method used (t, z, Wilson, Welch). Include sample sizes and units so others can interpret uncertainty correctly.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.