Pick the best origin for every order fast. Balance cost, speed, reliability, and capacity easily. See ranked options, then download CSV or PDF files.
| Origin | Distance (km) | Base fee | Per km | Per kg | Days | Capacity | Reliability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karachi DC | 1200 | 2.50 | 0.0018 | 0.65 | 3 | 120 | 97% |
| Lahore Hub | 320 | 2.20 | 0.0020 | 0.70 | 2 | 80 | 94% |
| Islamabad FC | 520 | 2.40 | 0.0017 | 0.62 | 2 | 60 | 96% |
Origin choice is a controllable lever in fulfillment economics. When the same order is shipped from different nodes, linehaul distance, carrier minimums, and handling variability change the landed shipping total. A 10% reduction in average lane distance can translate into meaningful savings when multiplied across monthly volume. This calculator surfaces those deltas by estimating base cost, surcharges, and a reliability-linked risk add-on for each origin. Teams often see 3–7% savings after routing updates, especially when high‑volume SKUs shift to nearer nodes during promotions and seasonal peaks nationwide operations too.
Carriers commonly bill by the higher of actual and volumetric weight. Volumetric weight is calculated from package dimensions divided by a divisor that approximates density thresholds. If your catalog includes bulky, lightweight items, dimensional exposure increases and the per‑kg term becomes more sensitive. Track the share of orders where volumetric weight exceeds actual weight; lowering void fill and standardizing carton sizes can reduce billable kilograms without changing product weight.
The model combines a base fee, distance cost (distance × per‑km), and weight cost (billable weight × per‑kg). Fuel, insurance, and returns percentages scale with the base cost, reflecting how many carrier add-ons are applied as a percentage. Reliability influences an additional penalty, which helps compare a cheaper origin that frequently misses scans against a slightly higher-priced node that performs consistently. Use your own negotiated rate cards to replace the sample values.
Two operational checks protect decision quality: SLA days and capacity. SLA aligns with promised delivery windows, while capacity reflects pick, pack, or carrier collection limits. If an origin violates either, the optimizer applies a penalty so it ranks lower unless alternatives are significantly worse. In peak periods, update capacity daily or weekly, and consider increasing the time weight when customer experience is the priority.
The score blends normalized cost, time, and risk using weights that sum to 100%. Normalization keeps metrics comparable across different ranges, so a one‑day change in transit time does not automatically dominate a small cost difference. For subscription or replenishment items, emphasize cost. For fragile or high‑value goods, increase risk weight and insurance assumptions. Export CSV for analysis, and attach the PDF report to internal approvals.
It is the origin with the lowest composite score after combining normalized cost, delivery time, and risk, plus penalties for failing SLA or capacity constraints.
Start with cost 60–70%, time 20–30%, risk 10%. Shift weight toward time for premium delivery promises, and toward risk for fragile, high-value, or compliance-sensitive shipments.
Use a performance metric you trust, such as on-time delivery rate, scan compliance, or damage-free delivery. Keep it consistent across origins for apples-to-apples comparison.
Returns add logistics cost beyond outbound shipping. The model uses a simple percentage proxy so origins with higher base costs also reflect higher expected returns handling expense.
Yes. Convert tiers into effective per‑kg and base values for the order mix you’re analyzing, or run multiple scenarios and compare exports for different weight bands.
No. It is a planning estimator for comparing origins. For final pricing, pull live carrier rates, apply contract minimums, and validate with recent invoices.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.