Estimate fuel energy, output, and plant economics. Test moisture, ash, uptime, and efficiency for reliable biomass planning.
Submit values to generate a full engineering summary.
Use consistent engineering assumptions. HHV should represent dry biomass heating value unless your fuel testing protocol states otherwise.
| Scenario | Wet Feedstock (t/day) | Moisture (%) | HHV Dry (MJ/kg) | Conversion Efficiency (%) | Parasitic Load (%) | Estimated Net Power (MW) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wood Chips | 120 | 28 | 18.5 | 31 | 9 | 6.32 |
| Rice Husk | 95 | 14 | 15.2 | 27 | 8 | 3.88 |
| Bagasse | 180 | 48 | 17.1 | 24 | 11 | 6.20 |
| Pellet Blend | 80 | 10 | 19.4 | 34 | 7 | 5.27 |
These rows are illustrative examples. Actual plant output depends on fuel testing, boiler design, auxiliary loads, operating strategy, and seasonal variability.
This engineering model is simplified for feasibility studies, preliminary design checks, screening analysis, and quick project comparisons.
It estimates dry biomass mass, thermal energy, net electric energy, average power, annual generation, feedstock cost intensity, and potential carbon offset using user-defined engineering assumptions.
High moisture lowers usable dry biomass and reduces available combustion energy. Wet fuel also increases drying demand, can reduce flame stability, and often lowers overall plant efficiency.
This model assumes HHV on a dry basis. If your laboratory value is on a wet basis, convert it first or the estimated energy output will be understated or inconsistent.
Parasitic load is the electricity consumed internally by plant systems such as fuel handling equipment, cooling systems, pumps, control systems, fans, and emissions treatment units.
Yes, but it mainly reports electrical output. For full CHP evaluation, also track useful thermal recovery, steam demand, and seasonal heat utilization efficiency separately.
No. It is a simple avoided-grid estimate based on annual generation and a grid emission factor. Full lifecycle analysis should include harvesting, transport, processing, and land-use impacts.
The cost result only reflects feedstock cost per generated MWh. It does not include labor, maintenance, capital recovery, financing, ash disposal, insurance, or permitting expenses.
Yes. It is useful for feasibility screening, scenario comparison, and quick engineering checks before detailed fuel characterization, heat balance development, and vendor-specific performance modeling.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.