Model buck, boost, and rectifier capacitor stress accurately. Enter voltage, inductance, frequency, load, ESR values. See RMS ripple, losses, and pass fail instantly here.
Sample scenarios for quick validation and sanity checks.
| Scenario | Topology | Vin (V) | Vout (V) | L (uH) | Fsw (kHz) | ESR (ohm) | Vripple RMS (V) | Cap Rating (A_rms) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DC-DC point-of-load | Buck | 12 | 5 | 22 | 500 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 2.2 |
| High step-up rail | Boost | 5 | 12 | 10 | 800 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 2.5 |
| Compact inverting stage | Buck-Boost | 9 | 15 | 15 | 400 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 1.8 |
L, and f_sw:
dIL ~= (Vin - Vout)*D /(L*f), with D ~= Vout/Vin.dIL ~= Vin*D /(L*f), with D ~= 1 - Vin/Vout.dIL ~= Vin*D /(L*f), with D ~= Vout/(Vin+Vout).Icap_rms ~= dIL /(2*sqrt(3)).
Icap_rms ~= Vripple_rms / ESR.
P_ESR = Icap_rms^2 * ESR(T), and ESR(T)=ESR25*(1+k*(T-25)).
Design note: Actual ripple depends on control mode, capacitor type, and layout.
Electrolytic and polymer capacitors convert ripple current into heat through ESR. At 500 kHz, a 20 mΩ ESR with 1.50 Arms ripple dissipates 0.045 W. If ripple rises to 3.00 Arms, loss increases to 0.180 W, quadrupling temperature rise for similar airflow. Datasheets may rate ripple at 100 kHz, so confirm ESR near your switching band.
For a 12 V to 5 V buck stage with L = 22 µH and f = 500 kHz, the calculator estimates dIL(pp) near 2.65 A. Using the triangular conversion, Icap,rms is about 0.76 Arms. Increasing frequency to 800 kHz reduces dIL by 37.5% and drops ripple current proportionally. Raising inductance from 22 µH to 33 µH cuts dIL by one third.
When ripple voltage RMS is measured, Icap,rms ≈ Vripple,rms/ESR provides a direct check. With Vripple,rms = 60 mV and ESR = 20 mΩ, the implied ripple current is 3.00 Arms. This can exceed dIL-based estimates if probing loops or load steps dominate. Measure at the capacitor pads with a ground spring.
The tool selects the maximum estimate to avoid under-rating. With a 2.20 Arms capacitor rating and a chosen ripple of 3.00 Arms, the margin becomes −36.4% and the status flags FAIL. Replacing the capacitor with a 4.00 Arms part yields a +25.0% margin. Two identical capacitors in parallel split ripple current and halve ESR.
ESR often increases with temperature. Using ESR(T)=ESR25(1+k(T−25)), k=0.0039 and T=65°C increases ESR by about 15.6%. In the 3.00 Arms example, dissipation rises from 0.180 W to about 0.208 W. If ambient is 85°C, the same model gives a 23.4% ESR increase, tightening thermal headroom.
Exported CSV and PDF snapshots support design reviews. Capture Vin, Vout, L, f, ESR, measured ripple, and capacitor rating for each operating corner. Store three cases: nominal load, peak load, and low-line input. Re-run after layout changes because ripple voltage is parasitic dependent. A dated report per prototype revision reduces regression risk and speeds approvals.
Use measured ripple voltage with verified ESR when possible. If measurement is uncertain, the inductor-ripple estimate is a good baseline. This tool chooses the higher value to reduce under-rating risk.
Ripple voltage can include switching spikes, probe-loop artifacts, and load-step content beyond the ideal triangular ripple. Those effects increase measured Vripple, raising the implied RMS current even if inductor ripple is moderate.
Yes. ESR, impedance vs frequency, and ripple-current ratings differ for electrolytic, polymer, and ceramic parts. Enter ESR close to your operating frequency and use the rating for the same temperature range stated in the datasheet.
Identical capacitors in parallel usually split ripple current and reduce total ESR. That lowers ESR heating. Real sharing depends on trace resistance and capacitor impedance, so place parts symmetrically and keep connections short.
PASS means the chosen RMS ripple current is at or below the entered rating. FAIL means it exceeds the rating, indicating you should increase rating, add parallel capacitance, lower ESR, or reduce ripple through L or frequency changes.
You can use the Vripple/ESR path if you know ripple voltage and ESR at the dominant ripple frequency. Rectifier waveforms are not triangular, so the dIL approximation may not represent the true RMS current.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.