Balance return targets with variance-aware portfolio allocation models. Compare weights, volatility, and estimated portfolio efficiency. Turn matrix inputs into clear allocation insights for planning.
Overall page flow stays single-column. The calculator fields use a responsive three, two, and one column grid.
| Asset | Expected Return (%) | Std. Deviation (%) |
|---|---|---|
| System A | 8.00 | 10.00 |
| System B | 12.00 | 16.00 |
| System C | 15.00 | 22.00 |
Example correlations: 1-2 = 0.25, 1-3 = 0.10, 2-3 = 0.35
Example target return: 10.00% with an investment amount of 100,000
Portfolio return: Rp = w1r1 + w2r2 + w3r3
Portfolio variance: Var(Rp) = wT Σ w
Covariance: Cov(i,j) = ρij × σi × σj
Sharpe ratio: (Rp − Rf) / σp
Target-return optimizer: w = Σ-1(λ1 × 1 + λ2 × μ)
The calculator builds a 3x3 covariance matrix from the standard deviations and correlations. It then inverts that matrix and solves the Lagrange multiplier system for the minimum-variance portfolio meeting the chosen target return.
A, B, and C frontier coefficients are computed from 1TΣ-11, 1TΣ-1μ, and μTΣ-1μ. Those values also generate the efficient frontier curve shown in the chart.
It calculates the minimum-variance portfolio for a chosen target return using three assets, their expected returns, volatilities, and correlations.
Negative values mean the unconstrained solution is using short exposure. This often appears when the target return is aggressive or correlations favor hedged combinations.
The efficient frontier is the set of minimum-risk portfolios for different target returns. Points above it are infeasible, and points below it are inefficient.
It compares excess return against portfolio volatility. Higher values generally indicate better return earned per unit of total risk.
Correlations control diversification benefit. Lower or negative correlation can reduce overall portfolio variance even when individual assets are volatile.
No. This version solves the unconstrained target-return problem. It does not impose a no-short-selling restriction or upper weight bounds.
Yes. Engineering teams can adapt it for risk-return style allocation problems involving projects, systems, energy mixes, or uncertain resource plans.
Invalid correlations, zero volatility, or a singular covariance matrix can break the inversion step. Small input adjustments usually resolve the issue.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.