Model performance using wind, area, density, and output. Instantly compare measured results against available power. Use exports, graphs, formulas, and examples for better decisions.
Use electrical output or captured aerodynamic power to estimate Cp, compare against the Betz limit, export results, and review a dynamic performance graph.
Available wind power:
Pavailable = 0.5 × ρ × A × V³
Power coefficient:
Cp = Pcaptured / Pavailable
If electrical output is entered:
Pcaptured = Pelectrical / (ηgearbox × ηgenerator × ηother)
ρ is air density, A is rotor swept area, V is wind speed, and η values are downstream efficiencies written as decimals.
For wind turbines, Cp indicates how effectively the rotor converts wind energy into captured rotor power. The theoretical Betz limit is approximately 0.593.
| Case | Power | Wind Speed | Rotor Diameter | Air Density | Combined Efficiency | Cp | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Utility Turbine A | 700 kW | 12 m/s | 50 m | 1.225 kg/m³ | 92.19% | 0.3654 | Strong |
| Research Rotor B | 180 kW | 9 m/s | 32 m | 1.200 kg/m³ | 89.38% | 0.5725 | Very High |
| Pilot Turbine C | 95 kW | 8.5 m/s | 24 m | 1.180 kg/m³ | 90.27% | 0.6420 | Above Betz Limit |
It shows how much of the available wind power becomes captured rotor power. Higher values indicate better aerodynamic energy conversion, but real turbines remain below the Betz limit.
That usually means one or more inputs are inconsistent. Common causes include underestimated rotor area, overstated power, incorrect wind speed, or efficiency values that are too low or too high.
Use the selector that matches your measurement. If you only know generator output, choose electrical output. If you already know rotor captured power, choose aerodynamic captured power directly.
Available wind power depends on the cube of wind speed. A modest change in speed can create a much larger change in available energy and therefore a noticeable shift in Cp.
Use site-specific density when possible. Temperature, altitude, and pressure all affect density. If you lack measured data, 1.225 kg/m³ is a common standard reference near sea level.
They cover losses after the rotor captures energy. These may include gearbox losses, generator conversion losses, controller losses, inverter losses, and cabling losses.
Yes. Use consistent wind speed, area, density, and efficiency assumptions across cases. That gives a fairer comparison of aerodynamic effectiveness between designs or operating conditions.
Many practical wind systems operate well below the theoretical maximum. Values around 0.30 to 0.50 are often realistic, depending on rotor design, loading, control strategy, and measurement conditions.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.