Analyze sequential speed, random IOPS, parity penalties, cache gains, rebuild stress, and latency with inputs. Plan balanced arrays for resilience, capacity, and realistic workloads.
| Scenario | RAID | Disks | Per-Disk Read | Per-Disk Write | Read Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virtualization host | RAID 10 | 8 | 550 MB/s | 510 MB/s | 65% |
| Backup repository | RAID 6 | 10 | 240 MB/s | 220 MB/s | 80% |
| Database volume | RAID 5 | 6 | 220 MB/s | 210 MB/s | 70% |
Usable Capacity = Disk Size × Capacity Disks Allowed By RAID Level
Sequential Read = Per-Disk Read × Disk Count × Stripe Factor × Cache Read Boost × Queue Efficiency × Overhead Factor
Sequential Write = Per-Disk Write × Usable Data Disks × Stripe Factor × Cache Write Boost × Queue Efficiency × Overhead Factor × Rebuild Factor
Random Read IOPS = Per-Disk Read IOPS × Disk Count × Cache Effect × Queue Efficiency × Overhead Factor
Random Write IOPS = Per-Disk Write IOPS × Usable Data Disks ÷ RAID Write Penalty × Cache Effect × Queue Efficiency × Overhead Factor × Rebuild Factor
Estimated Latency = Base Latency × Latency Penalty ÷ Cache Relief Factor
Write penalty defaults are modeled as 1 for RAID 0, 1, and 10, 4 for RAID 5, and 6 for RAID 6.
It estimates usable capacity, sequential bandwidth, random IOPS, write penalties, latency, and rebuild impact for common RAID layouts under configurable workloads.
RAID 5 must read old data, read old parity, write new data, and write new parity. That extra parity work reduces effective small-write performance.
RAID 10 mirrors disks in pairs, then stripes across those pairs. An odd disk leaves one drive unmatched, so the layout becomes invalid.
No. Cache helps most when workloads reuse hot data or absorb bursts. Large streaming writes and cold random reads may see limited gains.
It represents the performance loss while an array rebuilds or verifies data. During that period, controller and disk resources are partially consumed.
Matching them thoughtfully helps. If block size aligns well with stripe geometry, the array performs fewer partial-stripe updates and writes more efficiently.
No. Vendors differ in firmware, cache policy, parity engines, queue handling, and background tasks. Use the output as an engineering estimate, not a benchmark guarantee.
RAID 10 often performs best for mixed transactional workloads because it avoids parity penalties. RAID 6 offers stronger protection, but usually with slower writes.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.