Model queueing, processing, and network delays in seconds. Tune utilization and rates to meet targets. Get clear results instantly, then export and share securely.
| # | Scenario | Model | λ (rps) | c | S (ms) | ρ | P(wait) | Queue (ms) | System (ms) | Fixed (ms) | Total (ms) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No saved scenarios yet. Calculate and click “Save Scenario to Table”. | |||||||||||
This table is stored in your session. Refreshing keeps it; clearing browser session removes it.
| Scenario | λ (rps) | c | S (ms) | Network (ms) | Overhead (ms) | Expected retries |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline web API | 25 | 2 | 30 | 15 | 10 | 0 |
| Peak hour burst | 60 | 2 | 30 | 15 | 10 | 0 |
| Optimized service | 60 | 3 | 20 | 12 | 8 | 0 |
| Unreliable network | 25 | 2 | 30 | 35 | 10 | 1 |
Use these rows as starting points, then adjust λ, S, and c to match measured production conditions.
This calculator estimates mean response time as a sum of queueing delay, service time, and fixed latencies:
Practical note: mean response time can be much lower than tail latency. For SLO work, keep utilization comfortably below 1 and measure percentiles in production.
Arrival rate (λ) and mean service time (S) are the two strongest drivers of average response time. Convert field measurements into requests per second and milliseconds, then validate that utilization ρ stays below 1.0. In practice, teams often target ρ between 0.60 and 0.80 to preserve headroom for bursts, background work, and noisy neighbors while keeping costs predictable. Record the same units for every saved scenario to avoid misreads.
Utilization ρ equals λ divided by capacity (cμ). When ρ rises, queueing delay grows nonlinearly, so small load increases can produce large latency spikes. A stable system requires λ < cμ; otherwise, average queue length tends to grow without bound. Use the capacity value as a quick check before tuning other parameters or exporting a scenario for review. If ρ is high, scale or optimize before chasing micro-latencies.
The calculator separates queueing delay, service time, and fixed costs such as network, serialization, and overhead. This breakdown helps engineers decide where to invest effort: reduce S through optimization, lower fixed overhead via protocol choices, or mitigate network delays with caching and regional routing. The component table highlights each share so improvements can be prioritized by impact. For example, shaving 5 ms off serialization is irrelevant if queueing is 120 ms at peak.
Save multiple scenarios to build an engineering narrative: baseline, peak hour, and optimized alternatives. Adjust c to represent additional workers, threads, pods, or instances, and reduce S to represent code or database optimizations. Download CSV for analysis in spreadsheets, or generate a PDF snapshot for incident postmortems, design documents, and stakeholder updates. Keeping a short scenario name makes exports readable in reports and tickets.
A response-time target is most useful when paired with a realistic workload assumption. Set the target to an SLO threshold and test both average and burst conditions by raising λ. If results exceed the target, lower utilization by increasing c, reduce S by removing bottlenecks, or cut fixed overhead. Re-run until the target is met with margin. Consider adding retry penalties when upstream errors are common. Use saved rows to compare cost and latency tradeoffs across environments. When service time is estimated, validate it with p50 measurements and adjust for cache-hit ratios or database contention during load testing.
It estimates average end-to-end response time by combining queueing delay, mean service time, and fixed latencies such as network and overhead. It is best for early sizing and comparison across design options.
Use M/M/c when you have multiple parallel workers with similar service times. Use M/M/1 when requests are handled by a single shared worker or a single bottlenecked resource.
In queueing systems, waiting time grows nonlinearly as utilization approaches 1. Small increases in arrival rate or small regressions in service time can create large queues and longer response times.
Use a measured mean processing time from profiling or traces, excluding fixed network if you enter it separately. If you only have percentiles, start with p50 as a conservative mean estimate, then validate.
Yes. Retries add extra work and backoff delays. Use an expected retry count per request and a penalty per attempt to approximate their contribution to end-to-end time under real failure conditions.
It models average behavior, not tails. For percentile SLOs, keep utilization lower, measure p95/p99 in production, and treat the calculator as a sizing guide rather than a full latency distribution model.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.