What Skin Factor Represents
Skin factor is a dimensionless measure of extra near-wellbore resistance relative to an ideal completion. A positive value indicates additional pressure loss caused by damage, partial penetration, fines migration, or completion geometry. A negative value suggests stimulation, cleanup, or improved connectivity. Because it is dimensionless, skin lets you compare wells and interventions across reservoirs and operating rates.
Choosing the Right Method
The steady-state option uses a single pressure drawdown and a drainage radius assumption. It works best when boundary effects are established and pressures are stabilized. The transient semilog option is preferred when you have a valid straight-line segment on a semilog plot. It estimates permeability from slope and then back-calculates skin using a representative point at time t.
Use the same reference wellbore radius used in test interpretation, not casing OD. If partial completion or perforated interval differs from net thickness, adjust h to the effective flow height. Sensitivity runs with plausible re values can show whether uncertainty is dominated by boundaries or near-wellbore effects during early screening.
Interpreting Results and Pressure Loss
The calculator reports skin and an equivalent pressure-drop contribution due to skin. That pressure increment helps translate a dimensionless number into operational impact, such as increased drawdown for the same rate or reduced deliverability at a fixed flowing pressure. If turbulence is enabled, a non-Darcy term is added as D·q, producing a total skin that grows with rate.
Data Quality and Unit Consistency
Accurate skin requires consistent radii and reliable pressure measurements. Keep re and rw in the same length units, confirm re is larger than rw, and ensure viscosity and volume factor match the produced phase. For transient analysis, choose points within the infinite-acting window and avoid early-time wellbore storage or late-time boundary influence.
Reporting and Workflow Integration
Engineering reviews often require traceable inputs, assumptions, and calculated outputs. The export buttons create a compact CSV or PDF report from the latest run, including method, units, skin, and the key inputs used. This supports quick comparisons between test interpretations, completion candidates, and post-stimulation evaluations. Store the files with test reports to simplify audits and future re-interpretations.