Analyze payload use, schedule discipline, and energy intensity. Spot inefficiencies across fleets, routes, and operations. Use weighted inputs for clearer transport planning and control.
| Parameter | Example value |
|---|---|
| System name | Regional Freight Corridor |
| Distance per trip | 180 km |
| Actual average load | 16 tons |
| Rated capacity | 20 tons |
| Trips completed | 3 |
| Actual average speed | 62 km/h |
| Target speed | 70 km/h |
| On-time performance | 94% |
| Operational hours | 10.5 h |
| Planned hours | 11 h |
| Total energy used | 5900 MJ |
| Total operating cost | 1600 |
| Total emissions | 420 kg CO2e |
| Damage or loss rate | 1.2% |
| Benchmark energy intensity | 0.75 MJ/ton-km |
| Benchmark cost intensity | 0.22 per ton-km |
| Benchmark emission intensity | 0.05 kg/ton-km |
| Default weighted result | Transportation Efficiency Index ≈ 97.03 |
Transport work
TW = Distance × Actual Load × Trips
Intensity metrics
Actual Energy Intensity = Energy Used ÷ TWActual Cost Intensity = Total Cost ÷ TWActual Emission Intensity = Total Emissions ÷ TW
Normalized scores
Load Score = Actual Load ÷ CapacitySpeed Score = Actual Speed ÷ Target SpeedSchedule Score = On-Time Percent ÷ 100Availability Score = Operational Hours ÷ Planned HoursEnergy Score = Benchmark Energy Intensity ÷ Actual Energy IntensityCost Score = Benchmark Cost Intensity ÷ Actual Cost IntensityEmission Score = Benchmark Emission Intensity ÷ Actual Emission IntensityQuality Score = 1 - Damage Rate
Transportation Efficiency Index
TEI = [Σ(Weight × Score) ÷ Σ(Weights)] × 100
Each score is capped at 125% to prevent one unusually strong metric from overpowering the full engineering picture. A TEI near 100 indicates overall alignment with benchmark expectations. Values above 100 show performance beyond the benchmark mix, while lower values reveal inefficiency, underuse, or weak service control.
It shows how well a route or fleet converts capacity, time, energy, cost, and service quality into useful transport output against selected benchmarks.
A score near 100 means the weighted average performance is matching the benchmark set you entered for energy, cost, emissions, and service targets.
Yes. Replace tons with a consistent passenger-equivalent load basis and keep benchmark intensities in matching units for meaningful comparisons.
Weights let engineers prioritize what matters most. A city operator may emphasize punctuality, while a freight carrier may emphasize energy and cost.
The cap prevents one unusually favorable metric from masking weak performance elsewhere. It keeps the index balanced and easier to interpret.
Use internal best-case data, design targets, contractual targets, or reliable peer baselines. The benchmark should reflect realistic, defensible performance goals.
No. It is a screening and monitoring tool. Use it to compare systems quickly, then investigate weak factors with deeper engineering analysis.
Start with the lowest weighted factor scores. Common fixes include better loading, route redesign, reduced idle time, stronger maintenance, and tighter schedule control.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.