Map your canopy readings and compare every point. Spot weak zones before plants stretch too. Get clear uniformity scores and simple improvement tips today.
| Point | Reading (lux) | Note |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 320 | Near center |
| 2 | 340 | Under fixture |
| 3 | 300 | Edge area |
| 4 | 310 | Between fixtures |
| 5 | 355 | Hotspot |
| 6 | 295 | Corner |
| 7 | 305 | Side edge |
| 8 | 330 | Mid area |
| 9 | 290 | Farthest corner |
Uniform light reduces stretch, uneven leaf size, and maturity gaps across benches. When dark edges persist, plants compensate by elongating, which weakens stems and complicates irrigation timing. Hotspots can stress tissue and accelerate drying. Tracking uniformity alongside average intensity helps you separate “too dim overall” from “patchy distribution,” so adjustments target layout rather than simply adding more power. It also improves harvest planning and consistent quality.
Start with a simple rectangular grid and keep point spacing consistent. Measure at canopy height, with fans and curtains in their normal positions. Record readings after lights warm up to steady output. Use the same sequence each time, moving left to right, row by row. Consistency lets you compare tests after raising fixtures, adding reflectors, or changing spacing. Mark corners with tape to avoid drifting positions.
This calculator provides three ratios: Min/Avg, Min/Max, and Avg/Max. Min/Avg is practical for growth because it focuses on the weakest area relative to the overall field. Min/Max is stricter and highlights extreme hotspots. Avg/Max indicates how dominant the peak is. Pair ratios with coefficient of variation to capture overall spread, not just endpoints. They guide layout decisions and fixture selection.
Uniformity targets depend on crop sensitivity and distance from fixtures. For many propagation and leafy crops, a Min/Avg near 0.70 is a useful starting point. If your CV exceeds 20%, expect visible differences between zones. Review minimum values first; the lowest points usually dictate plant response. Use the chosen metric consistently so improvements are comparable across seasons. Document targets by variety and growth stage.
Common fixes include raising lights to widen the beam, adding diffusion film, or reducing spacing between fixtures. For uneven edges, add side reflectors or extend coverage beyond the crop boundary. If hotspots persist, dim slightly and increase distribution. After adjustments, retest using the same grid and record the new uniformity score. Small changes compound into reliable, repeatable production. Save exports to build a lighting maintenance record.
Use a grid that captures edges and center. Start with 3×3 for small trays, 4×4 or 5×5 for benches, and increase points when CV is high or fixtures overlap irregularly.
Test after installing lights, after any height or spacing change, and at least seasonally. Recheck whenever plants look uneven, you replace drivers, or you clean lenses and reflectors.
No. Use one unit type per test so ratios remain meaningful. If you must compare devices, run separate tests and focus on uniformity ratios, which are unitless, rather than absolute intensity.
Many growers aim for Min/Avg around 0.70 or higher. Sensitive crops may need better. Use your crop response as the final judge, and track the same metric over time for consistent comparisons.
Min/Avg highlights the weakest zone relative to typical conditions, which often predicts plant stretch and delay. Min/Max is stricter and can be dominated by one hotspot. Use the method that matches your goal.
You can still map uniformity with lux or foot‑candles if readings are consistent. Keep sensor height and grid spacing fixed. For crop‑specific targets, borrow or rent a PPFD meter to calibrate intensity once.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.