Plan long-term archives with accurate cloud cost estimates. Tune tiers, redundancy, retention to match budgets. Download CSV or PDF summaries for faster approvals internally.
Illustrative sample inputs and outputs for quick validation.
| Scenario | Stored | Months | Retrieved (GB) | Egress (GB) | Est. total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance archive | 2 TB | 24 | 10 | 5 | Varies by tier and region |
| Media backups | 8 TB | 12 | 250 | 120 | Sensitive to retrieval and egress |
| Analytics snapshots | 500 GB | 6 | 80 | 40 | Requests can dominate at scale |
Cold tiers fit infrequently accessed data kept for audits, legal holds, or disaster recovery. Budgeting starts with retained volume and duration, because storage is billed per gigabyte per month and may enforce minimum billable months. This calculator converts your archive size into billable gigabytes, applies retention rules, and produces an average monthly view for consistent comparisons across projects. Use it to align technical retention goals with financial planning cycles across products and teams.
In practice, the surprise is often access. Retrieval charges rise when restores become frequent, while transfer out can dominate when datasets are moved to analytics platforms or shared externally. Request fees add up when workloads rely on many small reads, listings, or metadata scans. By separating storage, retrieval, requests, and egress, the calculator shows which behavior drives spend and where policy changes will help. Scenario testing also helps prevent under-budgeting during incident recovery.
Deeper archival tiers usually offer lower storage rates but higher retrieval prices and longer minimum durations. If planned retention is shorter than the tier minimum, the estimate reflects enforced billable months. The tier presets provide starting points, and the editable rate fields let you mirror any provider’s price sheet. This supports “what-if” comparisons when compliance rules change or teams request faster restores.
Durability targets may require additional copies across zones or regions. That design improves resilience, but it multiplies storage charges. The redundancy option models this as a simple multiplier on storage. Regional differences are handled through one factor, enabling quick adjustments for premium locations. Together, these controls align cost projections with architecture decisions before procurement begins.
Finance and engineering teams need a breakdown they can reuse in approvals, tickets, or dashboards. The calculator provides a component table plus CSV and PDF exports to attach to budgeting documents. Because every rate is editable, you can capture assumptions in the inputs and regenerate reports when prices or usage patterns change. This supports repeatable planning for long-term archives at scale. Clear outputs reduce back-and-forth during reviews and speed up approvals.
Use 1.00 for baseline pricing. Increase it if your chosen region is consistently priced higher, or reduce it for discounted regions. It applies uniformly to keep comparisons fast and consistent.
Some cold tiers enforce minimum durations. If your retention is below that minimum, charges are estimated using the minimum billable months so the total reflects typical billing behavior.
They can be. Workloads that scan many objects, list frequently, or perform metadata-heavy operations may see request fees become material, even when retrieval volumes are small.
Model it the way you expect to operate. For rare restores, enter an average monthly retrieval based on expected frequency. For heavy restore periods, run separate scenarios and compare totals.
Copy the published rates into the Advanced pricing fields. Keep units consistent with the labels, and update them whenever your provider changes pricing or you negotiate a new contract.
No. The estimate focuses on metered storage, access, requests, and egress. If you have discounts, incorporate them by adjusting rates or applying a lower region factor for planning.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.