Estimate horizons, curvature bulge, and Fresnel clearance. Model obstacles and margins with flexible units. Export results and share clean reports.
| Scenario | Antenna A | Antenna B | Distance | Frequency | Obstacle | Expected insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Town link | 30 m | 25 m | 12 km | 5.8 GHz | 12 m at 6 km | Check Fresnel clearance and bulge impact. |
| Ridge hop | 18 m | 18 m | 9 km | 11 GHz | 22 m at 4 km | Higher frequency shrinks Fresnel radius. |
| Long span | 60 m | 40 m | 35 km | 2.4 GHz | None | Compare distance to combined horizon limit. |
The following planning notes expand on the computed outputs and how to apply them in wireless backhaul and site surveys. Document assumptions, then confirm with terrain profiles before builds.
Line-of-sight range grows with the square root of antenna height and the k-factor. For example, 30 m and 25 m endpoints typically yield a combined horizon near 23 km under k≈1.33. If your entered link distance exceeds the computed maximum path, no Fresnel tuning will recover the link without raising sites.
The k-factor represents an effective Earth radius under atmospheric refraction. Standard engineering defaults use 4/3, but dry inland conditions may trend lower while strong ducting can trend higher. Raising k from 1.0 to 1.33 increases horizon and reduces curvature losses, improving long spans without changing hardware.
Curvature bulge peaks around the midpoint. On a 12 km span, the bulge is small, but on 35 km it becomes a dominant term at mid-path. This tool reports bulge at the obstacle position so you can model a ridge, tree line, or rooftop that sits where curvature is greatest.
First Fresnel radius shrinks as frequency increases and grows as the product of segment distances increases. At 5.8 GHz, a 12 km link can have a Fresnel radius of several meters near mid-path; at 11 GHz it is noticeably smaller. Selecting 60% clearance is a common compromise between reliability and tower cost.
A pass at 0% margin can still fail when foliage moves, snow loads accumulate, or alignment drifts. Adding a fixed clearance margin (for example 0.5 m) helps protect against measurement error and seasonal growth. When clearance fails, the suggested height increase shows the minimum uplift required at the critical point.
Treat the output as a planning model, then validate in the field with a visual check, laser rangefinding, or drone survey. If distance is feasible but clearance fails, relocating one endpoint a few hundred meters can outperform adding several meters of mast, especially when the obstacle is close to one site.
It compares your entered link distance with the combined radio horizon from both antenna heights. If the link exceeds that limit, increasing height or reducing distance is required.
Refraction changes the effective Earth curvature. A higher k increases horizon and reduces bulge; a lower k does the opposite. Adjust k to stress-test links for typical local conditions.
The tool computes the line height at the obstacle, subtracts obstacle height plus Earth bulge, then compares the remaining clearance against your Fresnel percentage plus any extra margin.
60% is a widely used planning target for point-to-point links. Higher targets improve resilience but may require taller structures. Lower targets can work for short spans with stable environments.
Higher frequency yields a smaller Fresnel radius, so the same physical obstruction may clear more easily. However, higher bands often have higher path loss and stricter alignment needs.
It is suitable for preliminary design and quoting. For final builds, verify terrain, clutter, and regulations using mapped profiles, on-site measurements, and vendor link budgets.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.