Apparent Field of View Calculator

See how wide the sky looks today. Switch methods, units, and telescope parameters quickly here. Export results to share with your observing log easily.

Choose the data you already have.
Trigonometric handles wider angles better.
Use when the eyepiece AFOV is known.
Often measured from drift timing or plate solving.
Optional if focal lengths are provided.
Used to compute magnification when possible.
Needed for the field-stop method.
Usually listed in specs for some eyepieces.
Result appears above the form after calculation.

Formula Used

This tool supports three common ways to work with apparent field of view (AFOV).
Angles are in degrees, M is magnification, and focal lengths are in millimeters.

How to Use This Calculator

  1. Select a method based on the information you have.
  2. Enter your values. Use telescope and eyepiece focal lengths to auto-compute magnification.
  3. Press Calculate. The result appears above the form.
  4. Use Download CSV or Download PDF to save the output.
  5. Compare linear vs trigonometric when your measured true field is wide.

Example Data Table

Case Telescope FL (mm) Eyepiece FL (mm) True Field (deg) Field Stop (mm) Computed AFOV (deg)
Measured TFOV 1000 13 1.30 100.0 (linear)
Field stop spec 24 27.0 64.5
Known AFOV 1200 20 68.0 (direct)
Examples are illustrative; real-world values depend on eyepiece design and distortion.

Apparent Field of View Guide

1) What AFOV means at the eyepiece

Apparent field of view (AFOV) describes how wide the circular “window” looks when you place your eye at the eyepiece. It is an eyepiece property, not a telescope property. Common categories are narrow (around 40–50°), medium (about 60–70°), and wide (80° or more). Wider AFOV can feel more immersive, especially at higher magnifications.

2) AFOV versus true field of view

True field of view (TFOV) is the patch of sky you actually see, measured on the sky in degrees. TFOV depends on magnification, while AFOV describes the apparent angular size of the field stop at your eye. A simple relationship is TFOV ≈ AFOV ÷ magnification, which is useful for planning whether an object fits.

3) Using magnification and TFOV

If you can measure TFOV (for example with star-drift timing or plate-solving), you can estimate AFOV with AFOV ≈ M × TFOV. This linear approach is quick and works best when TFOV is small. With very wide angles, it can slightly overestimate because it ignores angular geometry and distortion.

4) Trigonometric method for wider fields

The trigonometric option uses AFOV = 2·arctan(M·tan(TFOV/2)). It better respects the way angles combine and can be more stable when TFOV is large. Use it when you have wide-field eyepieces, fast optical systems, or when your TFOV measurement is already precise.

5) Field stop method and why it is practical

Many observers trust field-stop based estimation because the field stop is a physical aperture inside the eyepiece. The approximation AFOV ≈ 57.2958 × (field stop / eyepiece focal length) gives a consistent comparison across designs. If you also know telescope focal length, you can cross-check TFOV from the same field stop.

6) Typical observing numbers

At 50×, an AFOV of 60° implies a TFOV near 1.2°, similar to the Moon’s diameter times two. At 100×, the same eyepiece feel yields about 0.6°. Wide 82° eyepieces at 100× show about 0.82°, which helps frame large clusters while keeping magnification useful.

7) Distortion and why two eyepieces can “feel” different

Eyepiece designs may trade distortion for sharpness or edge correction. Some eyepieces show pincushion distortion that changes how stars drift, affecting TFOV measurements. That is why comparing linear and trigonometric results is helpful, and why a published AFOV can differ slightly from an observed value.

8) Choosing the best method in this tool

Use the direct method when the eyepiece AFOV is known from specs. Use field stop when the manufacturer lists it, or when you want a design-neutral estimate. Use magnification plus TFOV when you have a measured TFOV. Save your result via CSV or PDF for repeatable observing logs.

FAQs

1) Is AFOV the same as true field of view?

No. AFOV describes how wide the view appears at your eye. True field is the actual angular size on the sky. True field changes with magnification, while AFOV is tied to the eyepiece design.

2) Which method is most accurate?

Field stop is often the most consistent when the field stop is known. If you measure TFOV precisely, the trigonometric mode can be very accurate. Linear is fine for small TFOV and quick estimates.

3) Why does the linear method sometimes differ?

Linear AFOV ≈ M × TFOV assumes small-angle behavior and ignores geometric effects and distortion. With wider fields, the approximation can slightly overestimate. Trigonometric mode reduces this problem.

4) What is a field stop?

The field stop is a physical ring or aperture inside an eyepiece that limits the illuminated field. Its diameter strongly influences the maximum true field a given eyepiece can show in a telescope.

5) Can I compute magnification automatically?

Yes. Enter telescope focal length and eyepiece focal length and the tool computes magnification as telescope FL ÷ eyepiece FL. You can also enter magnification directly if you already know it.

6) What units should I use?

Enter angles in degrees. Enter focal lengths and field stop in millimeters. The tool also reports arcminutes and arcseconds for convenience when comparing narrow fields or doing detailed planning.

7) How should I use the exports?

Use CSV to paste results into a spreadsheet or observing log. Use PDF for a clean printable record. Both exports pull directly from the results table so your saved values match what you see.

Related Calculators

schwarzschild radius calculatorescape velocity calculatormach number calculatorinverse square law calculatorzenith angle calculatorballistic coefficient calculatorpixel scale calculatorlocal sidereal time calculatorsolar declination calculatorroche limit calculator

Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.