Analyze laser beam divergence across any working distance. Compare methods, include waist, and estimate intensity. Download clean tables for documentation and quick sharing easy.
| Scenario | Inputs | Key Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Geometric spread | Divergence: 1.2 mrad (full), Distance: 25 m, D0: 2 mm | Spot diameter ≈ 32 mm | Uses D(z)=D0+2z·tan(θhalf). |
| Measured divergence | D1: 1.2 mm, D2: 7.2 mm, L: 10 m | Full-angle ≈ 0.60 mrad | Uses atan((ΔD)/(2L)). |
| Gaussian (M²) | Waist: 0.8 mm, λ: 1064 nm, M²: 1.3, z: 15 m | Diameter and θ computed | Includes zR and far-field θ. |
Beam divergence controls how quickly a laser expands with distance, which directly affects power density, alignment tolerance, and achievable feature size. For example, a 1.0 mrad full-angle beam grows about 1 mm in diameter per meter (small-angle approximation). In long free‑space links, this scaling dominates coupling losses and receiver aperture design.
Manufacturers often quote full-angle divergence, while many formulas use the half-angle. This calculator lets you choose either definition so you can match datasheets and lab measurements. Converting is simple: full-angle equals two times the half-angle. Mixing these conventions is a common source of factor‑of‑two errors.
The geometric model treats the beam as a cone: D(z)=D0+2z·tan(θ). It works well when divergence is set by optics or apertures, and when you only need a fast “order‑of‑magnitude” spot size. At small angles, tan(θ)≈θ in radians, so the math becomes very intuitive.
In the lab, divergence is often derived from two diameter readings separated by a known distance. The calculator uses θ=atan((D2−D1)/(2L)). For best accuracy, choose a separation large enough that the spot growth is several times larger than your measurement uncertainty (camera pixel size or burn paper blur).
Many lasers are well described by a Gaussian model. The Rayleigh range zR=πw0²/(M²λ) marks the distance where the radius increases by √2. With M²>1, the beam spreads faster than an ideal Gaussian. This calculator reports the 1/e² diameter and far‑field divergence θ≈M²λ/(πw0).
When you enter laser power, the tool estimates average irradiance using I=P/(πw²). This is useful for comparing exposure risk, material processing thresholds, or sensor saturation. Remember it is an average over the circular spot; peak irradiance for Gaussian beams is higher than the average.
Well‑collimated diode modules may show 1–5 mrad divergence after collimation optics, while high‑quality solid‑state beams can be below 1 mrad depending on waist size and wavelength. A larger waist generally reduces divergence, while longer wavelength increases it for the same waist. Use these trends to validate inputs.
Report your conventions (full vs half angle), distance reference, and diameter definition (1/e², FWHM, or aperture). If using cameras, calibrate pixels to millimeters and keep the sensor unsaturated. For repeatability, log multiple distances and fit a line to diameter versus distance before computing divergence.
Beam waist is the minimum beam radius (or diameter) in a Gaussian model. Spot diameter is the beam size at any chosen distance. The calculator can treat a given waist as the starting point for propagation.
If the beam is not in the far field, or if the measurement method changes (aperture clipping, saturation, or different diameter definitions), divergence estimates can vary. Use longer separations and consistent diameter criteria for stable results.
Use the convention from your source. Datasheets often give full-angle, while many equations use half-angle. This tool converts automatically, so select the option that matches your specification or measurement method.
Gaussian mode uses the 1/e² radius convention. The reported spot diameter is twice the 1/e² radius. If you measure FWHM or a clipped aperture, convert or expect differences from the model.
It is an average irradiance over the circular area. Real beams may have hot spots, ellipticity, or Gaussian peak intensities higher than the average. Use it for comparisons, not as a strict safety limit.
Yes. Inputs accept decimals and scientific notation (for example, 1e-6). Results display in a readable format, and the exports preserve the values for external analysis.
This calculator assumes a circular spot for area and irradiance. For elliptical beams, compute each axis separately using divergence per axis, then use an elliptical area (πab) for a better irradiance estimate.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.