Compute kcat over Km from flexible kinetic inputs. Choose units and compare efficiency ranges quickly. Export clean results for labs, students, and research workflows.
Catalytic efficiency compares turnover speed to binding strength and is commonly written as: kcat/Km.
| Case | Vmax | [E] | Km | kcat | kcat/Km |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 12.0 uM/min | 0.25 uM | 40 uM | 0.80 s⁻¹ | 2.0×10⁴ M⁻¹·s⁻¹ |
| B | 60.0 uM/min | 0.10 uM | 15 uM | 10.0 s⁻¹ | 6.7×10⁵ M⁻¹·s⁻¹ |
| C | 200 uM/min | 0.05 uM | 8 uM | 66.7 s⁻¹ | 8.3×10⁶ M⁻¹·s⁻¹ |
Catalytic efficiency, expressed as kcat/Km, summarizes how rapidly product forms when substrate is scarce. It combines turnover (kcat) and apparent affinity (Km) into a single, comparable metric. In screening studies, it helps rank catalysts without requiring saturating substrate concentrations.
Many enzymes and catalytic systems fall between 102 and 106 M−1·s−1, depending on mechanism and conditions. Values near 107–108 M−1·s−1 are considered extremely efficient and often approach diffusion control in aqueous solution. Comparing across studies requires consistent pH, ionic strength, and temperature.
If you have Vmax, [E], and Km, the calculator derives kcat = Vmax/[E] and then divides by Km. This approach is common when Vmax is obtained from a Michaelis–Menten fit. Accurate active-site concentration improves reliability, especially for partially active preparations.
When kcat and Km are already known, efficiency is a direct ratio. This is ideal for literature comparisons and for reporting standardized performance. Ensure both parameters were measured under the same buffer, temperature, and substrate identity, since even modest changes can shift Km appreciably.
At very low substrate, the initial rate follows v0 ≈ (kcat/Km)[E][S]. This calculator includes that option for quick checks and early screening. The approximation works best when [S] is far below Km; otherwise, the estimate will be biased low.
In solution, a practical upper bound for many bimolecular encounters is on the order of 108–109 M−1·s−1. If your calculated efficiency substantially exceeds this, the most common causes are unit mismatch, incorrect enzyme concentration, or an overestimated Vmax. The results box flags unusually high values.
Rates generally increase with temperature until stability limits are reached, so kcat can change strongly with conditions. Km may also shift with pH, cofactors, or substrate analogs, affecting the ratio. The optional temperature field helps document the context of each calculation for reporting.
Consistent unit handling is essential because catalytic efficiency is reported in M−1·s−1. This tool converts common concentration and time units internally to keep outputs comparable. Exporting CSV supports lab notebooks and spreadsheets, while the PDF output is convenient for sharing results with collaborators and reviewers.
It measures how effectively a catalyst converts substrate at low substrate levels, combining turnover speed and apparent binding strength into one comparable rate constant.
Use Vmax+[E]+Km if you fitted Michaelis–Menten data. Use kcat+Km if you already have both parameters. Use the low-[S] option for quick estimates when [S] ≪ Km.
Because kcat is computed as Vmax divided by enzyme concentration. If [E] is underestimated, kcat and efficiency will be inflated. Use active enzyme concentration when available.
The standard is M⁻¹·s⁻¹. The calculator also shows scaled forms for convenience, but comparisons across studies are most reliable when reported in M⁻¹·s⁻¹.
Many fast solution reactions approach about 10⁸–10⁹ M⁻¹·s⁻¹. Values far above that usually indicate unit errors, incorrect [E], or non-standard assumptions.
Yes. Km is a kinetic parameter that can reflect multiple rate constants, not only binding. It may differ from a true dissociation constant, especially in multi-step mechanisms.
If substrate is not well below Km, the approximation underestimates efficiency. Use full Vmax/Km inputs or collect additional rates at varied substrate concentrations to fit parameters.
Catalytic efficiency helps compare catalysts when substrate is scarce, because it predicts how fast product forms per catalyst amount and substrate amount. Many fast systems approach an upper bound set by molecular diffusion in solution.
Accurate catalytic efficiency estimates help optimize real-world reactions today.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.