Model dry deposition rates for gases and particles. Choose flux or resistance inputs. Get clear units, steps, and exports for quick decisions.
Deposition velocity links deposition flux and near-surface concentration: v_d = F / C. With F in mass per area per time and C in mass per volume, v_d has units of length per time.
A dry-deposition resistance model treats transport and uptake in series: v_d = 1 / (R_a + R_b + R_c), where resistances are in s/m.
| Scenario | Method | Inputs | Typical output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Urban aerosol day | v_d = F/C | F = 120 µg/m²/s, C = 50 µg/m³ | v_d ≈ 2.4 cm/s |
| Vegetation uptake | Resistance model | R_a = 25, R_b = 15, R_c = 160 (s/m) | v_d ≈ 0.50 cm/s |
| Compute flux | F = v_d·C | v_d = 1.0 cm/s, C = 40 µg/m³ | F ≈ 400 µg/m²/s |
Deposition velocity (vd) is an effective transfer speed that links air concentration to surface removal. It is commonly used in air-quality modeling to convert near-surface concentrations into dry deposition fluxes. Typical vd values span orders of magnitude, from about 0.01 cm/s for weakly reactive gases over smooth surfaces to several cm/s for highly reactive species or efficient particle capture on rough canopies.
When deposition flux (F) and near-surface concentration (C) are measured over the same averaging period, the ratio vd = F/C provides a direct estimate. Field studies often report aerosol fluxes in µg/m²/s or mg/m²/day and concentrations in µg/m³. Converting both into consistent SI units ensures vd is obtained in m/s and then displayed as cm/s or m/day for easier interpretation.
Many applications use a resistance framework: vd = 1/(Ra+Rb+Rc). Aerodynamic resistance Ra can vary roughly from 10–200 s/m depending on wind and stability. Quasi-laminar resistance Rb is often 10–100 s/m, while surface resistance Rc can range from tens of s/m (strong uptake) to thousands of s/m (weak uptake). Lower total resistance yields higher vd.
Rough surfaces (forests, urban fabric) enhance turbulence and reduce Ra, increasing deposition. Smooth surfaces (water, snow) often yield lower vd. Unstable daytime conditions typically increase turbulent transport, while stable nighttime stratification can suppress it. For particles, size matters: coarse particles deposit faster via impaction and settling, while ultrafine particles are influenced by diffusion and surface characteristics.
A quick diagnostic is to compare vd against expected magnitudes. For many gases over vegetation, values around 0.1–1 cm/s are plausible, while very high values (greater than 10 cm/s) often indicate inconsistent averaging, unit errors, or concentration not representative of the flux footprint. This calculator shows intermediate conversions to help audits.
Deposition velocity supports emission control assessments, ecosystem loading calculations, and model evaluation. For example, if C = 30 µg/m³ and vd = 0.5 cm/s, the implied flux is F ≈ 150 µg/m²/s. Over one day, that corresponds to about 13 g/m²/day, illustrating how small changes in vd can strongly affect deposition totals.
vd aggregates many processes into one parameter and should be interpreted as condition-specific. Wet deposition, resuspension, chemical transformation, and canopy storage can complicate direct flux–concentration ratios. When using the resistance method, input resistances must match the same reference height and land-surface assumptions.
Start with the method that matches your measurements. Use the flux–concentration mode for observed fluxes, and the resistance mode for modeling scenarios. Keep units consistent, review the steps, then export CSV or PDF for reporting. If results look unusual, test sensitivity by adjusting resistances or checking concentration units before finalizing conclusions.
For many gases over vegetation, 0.1–1 cm/s is a common starting range. For particles, values can be higher for coarse sizes and lower for ultrafine sizes.
Each resistance represents a time delay per meter of transport. Adding resistances gives a total s/m, and taking 1/R converts that combined delay into an effective speed in m/s.
Yes. Use the “Flux from vd and concentration” mode. It applies F = vd·C with unit conversion and reports flux in your selected unit.
Common causes include mixing units (day vs second), mismatched averaging periods between flux and concentration, or a concentration measured away from the deposition footprint.
No. It treats vd as an effective parameter from your inputs. If settling is important, incorporate it in the flux or in the resistances you provide.
Use the near-surface concentration representative of the same footprint as the deposition process, often at a reference height used by your monitoring or model configuration.
Include method, units, and averaging period. Export the result table as CSV or PDF, and document any assumptions about surface type, stability, and resistance parameter choices.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.