Model exponential beam loss through any absorber layer. Switch modes and units for clarity always. Download results as files to support reports easily now.
| Case | I₀ | I | x (cm) | μ (1/cm) | HVL (cm) | TVL (cm) | 1/μ (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Example | 1000 | 250 | 2 | 0.693147 | 1.000000 | 3.321928 | 1.442695 |
Tip: Keep intensity units consistent. Only the ratio I/I₀ matters.
The linear attenuation coefficient (μ) quantifies how quickly a narrow radiation beam is reduced as it passes through an absorber. It is used in shielding checks, detector window studies, and quick “how thick is enough” estimates. Because μ has units of inverse length, it directly links material thickness to transmission using an exponential model.
This calculator applies I = I₀ · e−μx, where I₀ is unattenuated intensity, I is transmitted intensity, and x is thickness. In practice, you can measure I₀ and I with the same instrument settings, then enter an absorber thickness to compute μ, or enter μ to predict transmission.
Only the ratio I/I₀ affects the math, so intensity can be counts, power, or dose rate—just stay consistent. Length units change the numerical value of μ. For example, 0.70 1/cm equals 0.07 1/mm and 70 1/m. This tool converts units so results remain comparable.
Transmission is T = I/I₀. Attenuation percent is (1 − T) × 100. If T = 0.25, then 75% of the initial beam is removed in the modeled path. Small changes in μ or thickness can strongly affect T because the relationship is exponential.
Half-value layer is HVL = ln(2)/μ, the thickness needed to halve intensity. Tenth-value layer is TVL = ln(10)/μ, a 10× reduction thickness. Mean free path is 1/μ, a characteristic attenuation distance. These are often easier to communicate in reports.
Suppose I₀ = 1000, I = 250, and x = 2 cm. Then T = 0.25 and μ = −ln(0.25)/2 = 0.6931 1/cm. The tool will also show HVL = 1.000 cm, TVL = 3.3219 cm, and 1/μ = 1.4427 cm.
With μ = 0.20 1/cm, a thickness of 5 cm gives T = e−1 ≈ 0.3679. Doubling thickness to 10 cm gives T = e−2 ≈ 0.1353. This illustrates why doubling thickness does not halve transmission; it squares the exponential effect.
The exponential model fits best for narrow beams with limited scatter and uniform material properties. In broad-beam or high-scatter geometries, buildup may increase transmitted intensity beyond the ideal model. Record geometry, energy, and thickness uncertainty, and use consistent significant figures when exporting CSV or PDF.
In the exponential model, attenuation cannot increase intensity. If I exceeds I₀, it usually indicates inconsistent measurements, different instrument settings, background subtraction issues, or data entry mistakes.
No. Only the ratio I/I₀ is used. You can enter counts, power, or dose rate, as long as I and I₀ are in the same units and measured under the same conditions.
Choose the unit that matches your measured thickness. The tool converts internally and lets you output μ and derived layers in the units you need for documentation.
HVL is the thickness that reduces intensity to 50%. It is a convenient way to compare shielding performance and communicate attenuation without repeatedly using exponential calculations.
TVL is the thickness that reduces intensity by a factor of 10. It is often used in shielding summaries because multiple TVLs approximate large reductions quickly.
μ depends on radiation energy, material composition, density, and geometry. If the spectrum, setup, or absorber properties change, the fitted μ may also change even if the thickness is similar.
Check that I/I₀ is between 0 and 1, confirm thickness units, and compare predicted I against a repeat measurement. You can also verify HVL using ln(2)/μ with the displayed μ value.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.