Model dispersion across wavelengths for reliable fiber links. Include chromatic, modal, and polarization effects easily. Export results to files and document your calculations clearly.
This calculator estimates pulse broadening contributions and combines them with a root-sum-square method.
ΔTchrom = |D(λ)| · Δλ · L (ps), where D is in ps/(nm·km), Δλ in nm, and L in km.D(λ) ≈ D(λref) + S · (λ − λref).D(λ) ≈ (S0/4) · ( λ − (λ04/λ3) ).ΔTPMD = PMD · √L (ps).ΔTmodal = (Modal ns/km) · L, converted to ps.ΔTtotal = √(ΔTchrom2 + ΔTmodal2 + ΔTPMD2).| Case | λ (nm) | Δλ (nm) | L (km) | D (ps/(nm·km)) | ΔTchrom (ps) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMF baseline | 1550 | 0.10 | 10 | 17 | 17.0 | Typical single-mode near 1550 nm. |
| Longer span | 1550 | 0.10 | 80 | 17 | 136.0 | Dispersion accumulates linearly with length. |
| Higher linewidth | 1550 | 0.50 | 40 | 17 | 340.0 | Broader sources increase chromatic broadening. |
Dispersion spreads pulses in time, shrinking eye opening and increasing intersymbol interference. In engineering terms it sets reach, impacts equalization effort, and defines whether you can reuse legacy fiber for higher rates.
Chromatic dispersion is usually given as D in ps/(nm·km). A common single‑mode value near 1550 nm is 16–18 ps/(nm·km), while many fibers sit near zero dispersion around 1310 nm. Because broadening scales as |D|·Δλ·L, doubling length doubles chromatic spread.
D varies with wavelength, so datasheets add a slope S, often about 0.05–0.09 ps/(nm²·km). A 10 nm shift from the reference can change D by roughly S×10, which becomes meaningful on long spans or dense WDM plans.
Some specifications give the zero‑dispersion wavelength λ0 and the zero‑dispersion slope S0. The calculator uses a standard approximation to estimate D(λ) across a wide band, letting you see how dispersion flips sign around λ0 while the timing spread depends on |D|.
Modal dispersion arises when different spatial modes travel different paths. It is often stated in ns/km. For scale, 1 ns/km equals 1000 ps/km, so even a few kilometers can add nanoseconds of spreading, dominating chromatic dispersion in many multimode links.
PMD is modeled as a random process, so its broadening grows with √L. Modern fibers may show around 0.05–0.2 ps/√km, but older routes can be higher. PMD becomes more noticeable as symbol periods shrink at high data rates.
Chromatic, modal, and PMD contributions are reported separately and then combined with root‑sum‑square (RSS). RSS is a common engineering approach when mechanisms are largely independent. The D·L output in ps/nm is also useful when sizing dispersion compensation or comparing spans.
The displayed NRZ bitrate limit is a quick screening metric, not a strict maximum. Real limits depend on modulation format, filtering, receiver bandwidth, and FEC. Use it to compare scenarios such as narrower linewidth, shorter length, or different wavelength windows. For coherent links, digital dispersion compensation can handle large D·L, shifting focus to OSNR and nonlinear penalties.
D is typically given in ps/(nm·km). Multiply by spectral width in nm and length in km to estimate chromatic pulse broadening in picoseconds.
The sign of D indicates whether longer wavelengths arrive earlier or later. Broadening magnitude depends on how much the pulse spreads, so |D| is used for timing spread estimates.
Enter modal dispersion for multimode fibers or legacy short-reach links where modal delay dominates. For most modern single-mode long-haul links, modal dispersion is negligible and can be left blank.
PMD behaves like a random process along the fiber, similar to a random walk. Independent birefringence sections add statistically, producing a √L dependence for the overall differential group delay.
No. It is a rough screening estimate based on total broadening. Actual limits depend on modulation, equalization, filtering, and FEC. Use it to compare cases and identify risky dispersion conditions.
Run one calculation per channel wavelength using the same fiber length. If you have slope or λ0 and S0, D(λ) can be updated per channel to compare channel-to-channel dispersion differences.
Common options include reducing spectral width, shortening spans, choosing a different wavelength window, adding dispersion compensation, or adopting coherent modulation with digital dispersion compensation.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.