Fit exponential bleaching from your intensity time series. Predict half life, tau, and remaining fluorescence. Download polished CSV and PDF outputs for every run.
This example shows intensity decay with background subtraction.
| Time (s) | Intensity (a.u.) | Background (a.u.) | Corrected (a.u.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 120000 | 2000 | 118000 |
| 10 | 101000 | 2000 | 99000 |
| 20 | 90000 | 2000 | 88000 |
| 30 | 82000 | 2000 | 80000 |
A common photobleaching model assumes a first-order decay in corrected fluorescence intensity:
Two-point estimate (after background subtraction):
Regression estimate using multiple points:
Physical estimate from optical parameters (simple model):
Note: Real systems can deviate due to triplet states, oxygen, and multi-exponential behavior.
For steady illumination, corrected intensity often follows I(t)=I0·exp(−kt). The constant k (s−1) summarizes irreversible loss channels. Typical widefield values are 10−4–10−2 s−1, while high intensity confocal scans can approach 10−1 s−1.
Background subtraction matters because the logarithm requires positive values. Estimate background from a dark region, pre illumination frames, or camera offset. With background 2000 a.u. and 120000 a.u. initial signal, the corrected start is 118000 a.u. Avoid over subtraction.
When only two frames are trusted, compute k=(ln I1 − ln I2)/(t2−t1) using corrected intensities. Example: I1=118000 at 0 s and I2=80000 at 30 s gives k≈0.0130 s−1, implying a half life near 53 s.
With three or more points, regress ln(Icorr) versus time. The slope equals −k, and the intercept estimates ln(I0). Regression tolerates irregular sampling if units match. R2 near 1 supports a single exponential; values below ~0.95 suggest drift or multi component decay.
The calculator reports τ=1/k and t1/2=ln(2)/k. If k=0.005 s−1, then τ=200 s and t1/2≈139 s. Use these to choose exposure counts or time lapse spacing that maintain a target remaining fraction.
If you lack a measured trace, the physical mode estimates k≈σ·Φ·Qb·duty, where photon flux Φ comes from power, wavelength, and illuminated area. At 0.5 mW, 488 nm, and 25 µm², Φ is ~1023 photons·m−2·s−1. Because σ and Qb vary widely, treat this mode as an order of magnitude guide.
Photobleaching can be confounded by focus drift, photobrightening, fluorophore exchange, or detector nonlinearity. Negative k usually means intensity increased or background was too high. If late points plateau, fit only the early linear region on ln(Icorr) or report segment wise k values.
Use the CSV and PDF exports to store k, τ, t1/2, and the processed table. For fair comparisons, keep exposure time, duty cycle, illumination area, and buffer conditions consistent. If settings change, record photon dose or include the optical inputs alongside fitted results. Archive raw traces and note the fitted time window for repeatable analysis across sessions.
It is the first order loss rate of fluorescent molecules under your conditions. Larger k means faster decay. It depends on illumination, oxygen, fluorophore chemistry, and local environment.
The exponential model applies to signal, not offsets. Background inflates late time intensity and biases k low. Also, regression uses ln(Icorr), which requires corrected intensities to stay positive.
Use regression when you have at least three reliable points. It reduces noise sensitivity, provides an R2 quality metric, and can estimate uncertainty in k from the slope standard error.
Multi state photophysics can produce multi exponential or stretched decays. Fit only an initial linear region on the ln(Icorr) plot, or split the trace into segments and compare early and late k values.
The calculator uses I(t)/I0=exp(−kt). Enter a prediction time to get the remaining fraction and percent. This helps plan imaging so the signal stays above a threshold.
It is p=1−exp(−kΔt) for an exposure duration Δt. It approximates the fraction of molecules bleached per frame in a simple first order model.
Because σ and Qb are highly system dependent and often orders of magnitude uncertain. Use the optical mode for rough bounds, then validate with measured decay data whenever possible.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.