Compute Poincaré recurrence time from key system statistics. Switch models, units, and time-scale conversions instantly. Save calculations, download reports, and share consistent results today.
| Scenario | Method | Inputs | Output (approx.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toy entropy model | Entropy | t0 = 1 s, S/kB = 10 | T ≈ 2.20×10^4 s (about 6.1 hours) |
| Rare event sampling | Probability | Δt = 0.5 s, p = 0.001 | T ≈ 500 s (about 8.3 minutes) |
| Uniform discrete states | State-counting | Δt = 0.1 s, N = 1,000,000 | T ≈ 100,000 s (about 1.16 days) |
Poincare recurrence describes bounded, volume-preserving motion returning near an earlier state. The recurrence time depends on how close "near" is and which region of phase space you track. For many-body systems it is typically enormous, so this calculator emphasizes scale and comparison.
Recurrence arguments work when the accessible phase space is finite and the evolution preserves measure. Closed Hamiltonian models, discrete maps on compact sets, and bounded spin systems often fit. Strong driving, dissipation, or coupling to an environment can violate the assumptions.
Time scales explode because the number of accessible microstates grows extremely fast with system size. A chosen macrostate occupies a tiny fraction of phase space, so returning is a rare event. This helps reconcile microscopic reversibility with macroscopic irreversibility in practice.
Entropy provides a shortcut: S/kB is often interpreted as ln(N), where N is an effective count of accessible microstates. If N scales like exp(S/kB), then recurrence times inherit the same exponential dependence. That exponential term dominates any microscopic time prefactor.
In entropy mode, the tool uses T about t0 times exp(S/kB). Choose t0 as a correlation or collision time that sets how quickly the system samples new configurations. You can enter S/kB directly or provide S in J/K for conversion, then read ln(T) and log10(T) safely.
Probability mode treats recurrence as a waiting-time problem. If each step of duration Delta t returns to your target region with probability p, the mean time is approximately Delta t divided by p. This is useful for simulations or measured time series where p comes from observed frequencies.
State-counting mode uses T about N times Delta t under a uniform assumption: one target state among N equally likely states. It is a baseline, but it matches entropy thinking because choosing N equal to exp(S/kB) reproduces the familiar exponential scaling.
Use the logarithmic outputs when T is huge, and compare scenarios by subtracting log10 values to get order-of-magnitude differences. Treat outputs as model-dependent: correlations, constraints, and nonuniform measures can shift effective N or p and therefore change recurrence estimates.
No. Recurrence requires bounded motion and a measure-preserving evolution on a finite accessible phase space. Open, dissipative, or driven systems can lose information or volume, so the classical recurrence argument may not apply.
Because S/kB is roughly the logarithm of the number of accessible microstates. If the effective state count is N, then N scales like exp(S/kB), and recurrence times scale similarly, producing huge values for large systems.
If you can measure a return frequency in your run, use the probability method with p and a sampling interval Delta t. If you only know an entropy-like state count, use the entropy or state-counting option for scaling estimates.
t0 is a microscopic time scale that sets the baseline for returns, such as a collision time, correlation time, or an update step in a model. It should reflect how quickly the system explores new, effectively independent configurations.
Recurrence times can exceed standard numeric ranges. Logarithms preserve information about scale without overflow and make it easier to compare cases. Use log10(T/s) for plots and order-of-magnitude reasoning.
No. Recurrence times for macroscopic decreases in entropy are typically far beyond practical time scales. The second law is statistical: entropy increase is overwhelmingly likely, while rare returns exist but are effectively unobservable in large systems.
They are estimates. Real systems have correlations, constraints, and nonuniform measures that change effective state counts and probabilities. Treat the outputs as intuition-building scales, not as precise forecasts for a specific laboratory setup.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.