Measure pull forces for real pulley setups quickly. Compare mechanical advantage, losses, and tensions clearly. Make safer lifts with confident calculations every time.
| Scenario | Load (kg) | Mode | MA | Efficiency (%) | Angle (deg) | Acceleration (m/s²) | Estimated effort |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workshop lift | 50 | Lift | 4 | 90 | 0 | 0 | ~136 N |
| Short angled pull | 50 | Lift | 4 | 85 | 20 | 0 | ~165 N |
| Two-mass demo | 50 vs 30 | Atwood | 1 | 95 | 0 | — | Acceleration computed |
Notes: η is efficiency (0–1). Angle θ is measured from vertical. These are engineering approximations and do not replace a certified lifting plan.
Mechanical advantage is the load support factor from rope strands. More supporting strands reduce effort, but increase rope travel. Real systems lose some benefit due to friction.
Bearings, sheave friction, rope bending, and misalignment waste force. A 90% efficient system needs about 11% more effort than ideal. Lower efficiencies raise effort quickly.
If you pull off-vertical, only the vertical component lifts the load. The calculator divides by cos(θ). At 30°, you need about 15% more force.
Count the rope segments directly supporting the moving block. Do not count the free end you pull unless it supports the moving block. For simple tackle, it equals the theoretical MA.
Yes. Set acceleration to 0 m/s². The result becomes the steady lifting effort, adjusted for mechanical advantage, efficiency, and pull angle.
It gives a practical estimate. Real setups also depend on pulley inertia, rope stretch, and friction models. Use measured efficiency and keep angles realistic for best results.
No. Use it for learning, planning, and quick checks. For lifting people or critical loads, follow local standards and a qualified engineer’s rigging plan.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.