Quantum Monte Carlo Calculator

Explore quantum energies using variational Monte Carlo. Tune sampling, blocks, and compare analytic ground states. Download results, verify convergence, and refine trial parameters today.

Inputs

Use consistent units across all inputs.
For a 1D harmonic oscillator potential.
Set ℏ = 1 for natural units.
Controls the Gaussian width.
Nonzero x₀ breaks symmetry in sampling.
Energy is always used for blocks.
Max 200,000 for fast page loads.
Discarded to reach equilibrium.
Aim for 30–70% acceptance.
Blocks estimate uncertainty under correlation.
Change seed to test statistical stability.
Reset
Note: This tool implements Variational Monte Carlo for a 1D harmonic oscillator. Large sample sizes can increase server load.

Example data table

m ω α Δ Samples Expected trend
1110.51.020000 Mean energy ≈ 0.5 with good tuning
1110.31.230000 Energy increases; trial width is too broad
1211.00.825000 Ground state rises; exact value is ℏω/2 = 1
Use the seed to reproduce results while adjusting Δ and α.

Formula used

Hamiltonian (1D harmonic oscillator)
H = - (ℏ² / 2m) d²/dx² + (1/2) m ω² x²
Trial wavefunction
ψT(x) = exp( -α (x - x₀)² )
Metropolis acceptance
A = min(1, |ψT(x′)|² / |ψT(x)|² )
Proposals use x′ = x + U(-Δ, Δ).
Local energy
EL(x) = \(\frac{ℏ²α}{m}\) - \(\frac{2ℏ²α²}{m}\)(x-x₀)² + (1/2)mω²x²
The Monte Carlo estimate is ⟨E⟩ ≈ (1/N) Σ EL(xᵢ).
Block uncertainty
Samples are split into blocks. The standard error is computed from the variance of block means to reduce correlation bias.

How to use this calculator

  1. Start with m=1, ω=1, ℏ=1, and α=0.5.
  2. Choose a step size Δ that gives 30–70% acceptance.
  3. Use 20,000+ samples and 20+ blocks for stable errors.
  4. Compare the mean energy to the exact value ℏω/2.
  5. Adjust α toward mω/(2ℏ) to lower the energy.
  6. Change the seed to verify statistical reproducibility.
  7. Export CSV/PDF to archive parameter sweeps and results.

Quantum Monte Carlo article

1) What this calculator simulates

This tool demonstrates Variational Monte Carlo (VMC) for a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator. It samples x from |ψT(x)|² using a Metropolis walk and averages the local energy EL(x). With m=1, ω=1, and ℏ=1, the exact ground energy is 0.5.

2) Model parameters and consistent units

The Hamiltonian mixes kinetic and potential terms, so use one consistent unit system. The reference energy scale is ℏω/2. For example, with ℏ=1 and ω=2, the ground-state benchmark is 1.0, so a tuned run should move toward that value as α improves.

3) Trial wavefunction and the α knob

The trial state is Gaussian: ψT(x)=exp(-α(x-x₀)²). Larger α narrows the distribution; smaller α broadens it and can raise potential-energy excursions. For x₀=0, the analytic VMC energy is E(α)=ℏ²α/(2m)+mω²/(8α), minimized at α=mω/(2ℏ).

4) Metropolis sampling and acceptance data

Each step proposes x′=x+U(-Δ,Δ). Small Δ yields slow exploration and high correlation; large Δ yields many rejections. A practical target is 30–70% acceptance. With 20,000 samples, tune Δ until the acceptance ratio is roughly stable (often near 50%).

5) Burn-in and autocorrelation control

Burn-in discards early steps before equilibrium. A useful starting choice is 10–20% of the post-burn sample count. If the block running mean drifts, increase burn-in or retune Δ. Because samples are correlated, uncertainties should rely on block statistics, not raw variance.

6) Blocking analysis for uncertainty

To estimate a realistic standard error, the run is split into blocks and the variance of block means is used. If you request N samples and B blocks, the code uses Nused=B·floor(N/B), so all blocks match. Too few blocks can understate error; too many blocks make blocks too short. A solid baseline is B=20 with N≥20,000.

7) Benchmarks and parameter sweeps

Validate runs against the exact ground energy ℏω/2 and the analytic E(α) when x₀=0. If the mean energy is high, tune Δ and move α toward mω/(2ℏ). Try α sweeps like 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6 and archive each run via CSV/PDF.

8) Practical limitations and interpretation

VMC quality depends on the trial function, so ⟨H⟩ typically remains above the true ground state. The “sign problem” is sidestepped here because the sampling density is positive. Use this calculator to practice tuning and convergence checks. For deeper studies, increase samples (up to 200,000), keep acceptance in-range, and monitor block running means. Repeat runs with new seeds to confirm stability.

FAQs

1) Is this Variational Monte Carlo or Diffusion Monte Carlo?

This is Variational Monte Carlo. It samples |ψT(x)|² and averages the local energy. Diffusion Monte Carlo uses imaginary-time projection and different estimators.

2) Why does the reported energy stay above the exact value?

VMC is variational: the computed ⟨H⟩ with a trial state cannot go below the true ground energy. Improving α and reducing correlation typically brings the estimate closer from above.

3) What acceptance ratio should I aim for?

Try 30–70%. If acceptance is very high, Δ may be too small and samples correlate strongly. If acceptance is very low, Δ is too large and the chain barely moves.

4) How many samples and blocks are reasonable defaults?

A practical starting point is 20,000 samples with 20 blocks and about 3,000 burn-in steps. If the block running mean drifts, increase samples or retune Δ.

5) Why does the calculator use Nused smaller than my requested samples?

For clean blocking, it uses Nused=B·floor(N/B) so blocks have equal size. The small remainder is discarded to keep block statistics consistent.

6) What does x₀ change in the simulation?

x₀ shifts the Gaussian center used for sampling. Nonzero x₀ can bias ⟨x⟩ away from zero and is useful for testing symmetry, but the oscillator potential still depends on x.

7) How do I choose α for the best result?

For x₀=0, the analytic minimum occurs at α=mω/(2ℏ). Use that as a target, then verify with Monte Carlo runs and confirm convergence using block means and the standard error.

Related Calculators

markov chain monte carlometropolis monte carlokinetic monte carlodiscrete element methodconjugate heat transfermultibody dynamicsstiff ode solveradaptive mesh refinementparticle in celldissipative particle dynamics

Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.