Measure costs across inspections, scrap, rework, and returns. Compare prevention and failure spending by period. See trends, reduce waste, and support better quality decisions.
| Input Group | Example Metric | Example Value | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prevention | Training Hours × Rate | 22 × 28 = 616 | Builds skills before defects happen. |
| Prevention | Calibration + Planning | 600 + 850 = 1,450 | Improves process readiness and control. |
| Appraisal | Inspection and Testing | 1,940 | Measures checking effort across stages. |
| Internal Failure | Scrap + Rework + Downtime | 3,093 | Captures waste before shipment. |
| External Failure | Returns + Warranty + Complaints | 1,446 | Shows customer-facing quality losses. |
| Total | Total Quality Assurance Cost | 8,145 | Summarizes complete quality cost picture. |
It measures the total cost of quality by combining prevention, appraisal, internal failure, and external failure spending. This helps you see where money is being used effectively and where defects are creating avoidable losses.
Prevention costs fund actions that stop defects before they occur. Training, process design, and supplier audits usually cost less than fixing scrap, handling returns, or managing warranty problems later.
Prevention aims to avoid problems at the source. Appraisal checks whether work meets the standard through inspections, testing, and verification. Both are conformance costs, but they serve different control purposes.
Internal failure costs happen before delivery. Scrap, rework, downtime, and yield loss all belong here. These costs usually show how much poor process control is affecting operations inside the business.
External failure costs happen after the product reaches the customer. Returns, warranty claims, complaint handling, field service, and recalls all indicate the financial impact of escaped defects.
Cost per unit shows how much quality-related spending is attached to each produced unit. It is useful when comparing periods, factories, product lines, or improvement projects with different output volumes.
This ratio compares failure costs with prevention and appraisal costs. A high value means more money is being lost to defects than invested in control, which often signals improvement potential.
Yes. You can use any review period as long as all inputs cover the same timeframe. Monthly, quarterly, and yearly reviews work well when data is entered consistently.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.