Measure assurance across audit scenarios quickly. Compare target risk, sample effort, and exposure clearly today. Plan procedures with stronger evidence, coverage, confidence, and judgment.
| Scenario | Audit Risk | Inherent Risk | Control Risk | Detection Risk | Sample Size | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue cutoff testing | 5.00% | 90.00% | 70.00% | 7.94% | 220 | 12.22% |
| Procurement control review | 5.00% | 75.00% | 60.00% | 11.11% | 150 | 10.00% |
| Payroll cycle testing | 5.00% | 50.00% | 40.00% | 25.00% | 100 | 8.33% |
| Fixed asset additions | 8.00% | 45.00% | 50.00% | 35.56% | 60 | 15.00% |
Core audit model:
Detection Risk = Audit Risk ÷ (Inherent Risk × Control Risk)
Required Substantive Assurance = 1 − Detection Risk
Sample Coverage = Sample Size ÷ Population Items
Effective Coverage = Sample Coverage × Testing Effectiveness
Expected Misstatement Value = Population Value × Expected Misstatement Rate
Estimated Undetected Exposure = Expected Misstatement Value × Detection Risk × (1 − Testing Effectiveness)
Coverage Gap = Required Assurance − Effective Coverage, floored at zero
The first formula is the standard audit-risk relationship. The added indicators help planning decisions by translating risk into exposure, coverage, and execution pressure.
Detection risk is the chance audit procedures fail to find a material misstatement that already exists in the population.
When inherent risk rises, the engagement starts from a riskier position. That leaves less room for missed issues, so procedures must be stronger.
Audit risk is the overall chance of issuing the wrong opinion. Detection risk is only one component within that broader model.
No. It supports planning and documentation, but actual audit decisions still depend on evidence quality, context, standards, and reviewer judgment.
They do not change the core formula. They convert the result into planning indicators such as coverage, expected exposure, and assurance pressure.
There is no universal best value. Lower percentages are stricter and usually require more persuasive audit work.
Better controls lower combined risk. That can increase allowable detection risk and reduce the amount of direct substantive testing needed.
Yes. The exports help retain assumptions, outcomes, and scenario comparisons in workpapers or internal review files.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.