Model disruption probability, supplier dependence, lead time stress, and recovery strength. Prioritize actions faster today. Turn scattered signals into practical resilience decisions for teams.
Use percentage scores for direct risks, higher values meaning more risk. Use visibility and cyber readiness as strength scores, where higher values reduce risk.
The calculator converts timing and resilience inputs into 0–100 risk scores, then applies weighted aggregation to produce one overall disruption score.
Lead Time Risk = min((Lead Time Days / 120) × 100, 100) Recovery Risk = min((Recovery Days / 60) × 100, 100) Inventory Risk = 100 − min((Inventory Buffer Days / 45) × 100, 100) Alternate Supplier Risk = 100 − min((Alternate Suppliers / 5) × 100, 100) Visibility Weakness = 100 − Visibility Score Cyber Weakness = 100 − Cyber Readiness Overall Risk Score = (0.13 × Disruption Probability) + (0.14 × Impact Severity) + (0.10 × Single-Source Dependency) + (0.08 × Lead Time Risk) + (0.08 × Recovery Risk) + (0.08 × Inventory Risk) + (0.07 × Alternate Supplier Risk) + (0.08 × Financial Risk) + (0.07 × Transport Volatility) + (0.07 × Geopolitical Exposure) + (0.04 × Visibility Weakness) + (0.03 × Cyber Weakness) + (0.03 × Quality Instability) Estimated Disruption Loss = (Overall Risk Score / 100) × [(Annual Spend × Revenue at Risk %) + (Downtime Cost per Day × Recovery Days)]
The weighted model emphasizes likelihood, impact, dependency, and recoverability, while still accounting for resilience levers such as visibility, cyber readiness, and supplier redundancy.
| Supplier | Region | Probability | Impact | Lead Time | Buffer | Alternates | Risk Score | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semiconductor Hub A | East Asia | 68 | 82 | 56 days | 8 days | 1 | 74.20 | High |
| Packaging Partner B | South Asia | 44 | 58 | 24 days | 20 days | 3 | 49.85 | Moderate |
| Raw Material Source C | South America | 61 | 76 | 48 days | 10 days | 0 | 72.10 | High |
| Regional Distributor D | Europe | 22 | 35 | 10 days | 30 days | 4 | 25.90 | Moderate |
Use the example rows to benchmark your own inputs or compare multiple suppliers using the same scoring framework.
It represents combined disruption pressure after weighting likelihood, impact, dependency, recovery, logistics, and resilience controls. Higher scores signal greater continuity risk and weaker protective capacity.
Strong visibility helps teams detect issues earlier, while cyber readiness lowers interruption chances from attacks, outages, or system compromise. Both improve control and shorten response time.
Use internal scoring policies when available. Otherwise, map 0 as negligible, 50 as material, and 100 as severe. Consistency across suppliers matters more than perfect precision.
Yes. You can score any supplier, lane, plant, warehouse, or logistics node. For multi-tier analysis, calculate each critical node separately and compare the results.
It is a scenario-based financial indicator using annual spend exposure, revenue at risk, downtime cost, and the final disruption score. It helps prioritize mitigation budgets.
Longer lead times usually reduce flexibility and slow recovery. Normalizing them into a 0–100 score makes them comparable with percentage-based risk inputs.
Yes. Enter one supplier at a time and record the results, or export each scenario as CSV or PDF. This supports consistent side-by-side supplier ranking.
Scores at 75 or above are labeled severe and usually justify immediate action, especially when the node is single-sourced, slow to recover, or financially critical.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.