Check schema types, required fields, warnings, and syntax. Score markup quality using weighted validation factors. Review errors, export reports, and visualize technical health instantly.
| Schema Type | Required Fields | Recommended Fields | Typical Goal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Article | headline, author, datePublished | image, description, publisher | News and editorial visibility |
| Product | name, image, offers | brand, sku, rating, review | Shopping rich result potential |
| FAQPage | mainEntity | name, url | Question-based enhancement |
| LocalBusiness | name, address, telephone | hours, geo, image, url | Local relevance signals |
The checker uses a weighted quality model:
Overall Score = (Mobile Clarity Score × Mobile Weight + Required Field Score × Required Weight + Recommended Field Score × Recommended Weight + Syntax Score × Syntax Weight + Consistency Score × Consistency Weight) ÷ Total Weight
Required Field Score = (Required fields found ÷ Required fields expected) × 100
Recommended Field Score = (Recommended fields found ÷ Recommended fields expected) × 100
Syntax Score = 100 when JSON-LD parses correctly, otherwise 0.
Rich Result Readiness blends required coverage, recommended coverage, syntax integrity, and consistency strength for a practical optimization view.
It reviews JSON-LD syntax, required property coverage, recommended property coverage, page consistency, and practical markup quality signals for search-focused audits.
No. A strong score improves confidence, but search engines still decide eligibility based on policy, crawlability, content quality, and query intent.
Yes. The checker reads arrays and graph structures, counts detected nodes, and evaluates the primary node against the selected or detected schema type.
This version is designed for JSON-LD input. It does not directly parse Microdata or RDFa without first converting them into JSON-LD.
Recommended fields often improve context, display quality, and search confidence. They may not be mandatory, but they frequently strengthen structured data usefulness.
Missing context, missing type, weak alignment between page details and schema details, and structural issues such as non-sequential breadcrumb positions can reduce it.
Exports help with client reporting, team review, quality tracking, issue handoff, and historical comparison across multiple pages or audits.
Yes. You can change the weights for mobile clarity, required fields, recommended fields, syntax, and consistency before running the analysis.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.