Vertical Jump Power Calculator

Turn jump height and body mass into power. Choose formulas, see watts and watts/kg instantly. Export CSV or PDF, then train with purpose daily.

Inputs
Enter measurements
3 columns on large screens, 2 on smaller, 1 on mobile.
Used by all models.
Pick the measurement you have.
Applies to height and reach fields.
Height from a jump test.
Standing reach height.
Highest touch height.
Height uses h = g·t²/8.
Choose a method for power estimation.
Required for work-based power.
Use 9.80665 on Earth.
Controls displayed rounding.
Example data table

Sample inputs and outputs to help you verify calculations.

Mass (kg) Jump (cm) Model Power (W) Relative (W/kg)
75 45 Sayers ~4,976 ~66.35
82 52 Harman ~6,060 ~73.90
68 40 Work (t=0.30s) ~889 ~13.07
Note: Work-based power is an average during takeoff, not peak power.
Formula used
Jump height from flight time
h = g · t² / 8
h in meters, g in m/s², t in seconds.
Takeoff velocity
v = √(2 · g · h)
Ballistic estimate assuming equal takeoff and landing heights.
Mechanical work against gravity
Work = m · g · h
Used for average-power calculations.
Sayers peak power estimate
P = 60.7 · VJ(cm) + 45.3 · m(kg) − 2055
Field equation returning a peak power estimate in watts.
Harman peak power estimate
P = 61.9 · VJ(cm) + 36.0 · m(kg) + 1822
Alternative field equation returning a peak power estimate in watts.
How to use this calculator
  1. Enter body mass and select the correct unit.
  2. Choose a jump input mode and provide the measurements.
  3. Select a power model for peak or average estimates.
  4. If using work-based power, enter takeoff time.
  5. Click Calculate to view results above the form.

Power output benchmarks in jumping sports

Peak power values from field equations commonly fall between 3,000–7,000 W for trained adults, depending on body mass and jump height. Relative power often ranges from 40–80 W/kg, helping compare athletes across weight classes in basketball, volleyball, and sprint events.

How jump height influences estimated watts

Because both Sayers and Harman equations scale linearly with jump height in centimeters, adding 5 cm typically raises the estimate by roughly 300 W. This makes small technique gains meaningful: repeated tests can reveal performance trends even when body mass stays stable. For monitoring, a coefficient of variation under 5% is a target.

Why model choice changes the number

Different datasets and protocols produced different coefficients. Harman generally yields higher watt values at moderate-to-high jump heights, while Sayers can be lower for lighter athletes. Use one model consistently for monitoring; switch models only when comparing to specific team norms or research. When reporting, note the model, jump method, and units to avoid misinterpretation.

Interpreting work and average power

The work method uses Work = m·g·h and divides by takeoff time, so it estimates average concentric power during the push-off. Typical takeoff times of 0.25–0.40 s can produce 800–2,500 W averages. It is not a peak-power substitute. If you capture force-plate time, this view can align better with training cues about fast intent.

Testing quality and measurement error

Measurement noise matters. A reach test can vary with shoulder position, and flight-time estimates assume equal takeoff and landing heights. Use consistent footwear, warm-up, and surface. Record three trials and use the best or the average to reduce random error.

Using results for training decisions

If watts rise while jump height is flat, improved mass-normalized power may still indicate better force-velocity capability. If jump height rises but watts fall, body mass changes may be driving the shift. Pair this calculator with strength and sprint metrics to plan programming blocks. A simple rule: pursue higher W/kg in speed blocks and higher jump height in peaking phases.

FAQs
1) Which model should I use for tracking progress?
Pick one model and keep it consistent. Sayers and Harman estimate peak power, while the work method estimates average push-off power and needs takeoff time.
2) Why do Sayers and Harman give different watts?
They were derived from different samples and testing setups, so coefficients differ. The key is consistency: compare results within the same model, not across models.
3) Is flight-time height accurate?
It can be useful but assumes takeoff and landing heights match. Knee bend and landing posture can bias estimates, so keep technique consistent and use repeat trials.
4) What does watts per kilogram tell me?
W/kg normalizes power to body mass, making comparisons fairer across athletes. It is also helpful when body weight changes during a season or training cycle.
5) Why is my result negative sometimes?
At low jump heights or very light mass, some field equations can output negative values. That usually means you are outside the equation’s reliable range, not that power is truly negative.
6) How often should I test my vertical jump?
Every 1–2 weeks works for most athletes. Test after a similar warm-up, on the same surface, and use the best of three attempts to reduce noise.
Tip: Keep technique and footwear consistent across tests.

Related Calculators

Powerlifting TotalWilks Score CalculatorRelative Strength IndexStrength Level ChartPower Output CalculatorPeak Power CalculatorLoad Velocity ProfileTraining Max CalculatorEpley Max FormulaRepetition Max Predictor

Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.