Turn jump height and body mass into power. Choose formulas, see watts and watts/kg instantly. Export CSV or PDF, then train with purpose daily.
Sample inputs and outputs to help you verify calculations.
| Mass (kg) | Jump (cm) | Model | Power (W) | Relative (W/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 75 | 45 | Sayers | ~4,976 | ~66.35 |
| 82 | 52 | Harman | ~6,060 | ~73.90 |
| 68 | 40 | Work (t=0.30s) | ~889 | ~13.07 |
Peak power values from field equations commonly fall between 3,000–7,000 W for trained adults, depending on body mass and jump height. Relative power often ranges from 40–80 W/kg, helping compare athletes across weight classes in basketball, volleyball, and sprint events.
Because both Sayers and Harman equations scale linearly with jump height in centimeters, adding 5 cm typically raises the estimate by roughly 300 W. This makes small technique gains meaningful: repeated tests can reveal performance trends even when body mass stays stable. For monitoring, a coefficient of variation under 5% is a target.
Different datasets and protocols produced different coefficients. Harman generally yields higher watt values at moderate-to-high jump heights, while Sayers can be lower for lighter athletes. Use one model consistently for monitoring; switch models only when comparing to specific team norms or research. When reporting, note the model, jump method, and units to avoid misinterpretation.
The work method uses Work = m·g·h and divides by takeoff time, so it estimates average concentric power during the push-off. Typical takeoff times of 0.25–0.40 s can produce 800–2,500 W averages. It is not a peak-power substitute. If you capture force-plate time, this view can align better with training cues about fast intent.
Measurement noise matters. A reach test can vary with shoulder position, and flight-time estimates assume equal takeoff and landing heights. Use consistent footwear, warm-up, and surface. Record three trials and use the best or the average to reduce random error.
If watts rise while jump height is flat, improved mass-normalized power may still indicate better force-velocity capability. If jump height rises but watts fall, body mass changes may be driving the shift. Pair this calculator with strength and sprint metrics to plan programming blocks. A simple rule: pursue higher W/kg in speed blocks and higher jump height in peaking phases.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.