Analyze treated and untreated outcome odds with precision. Enter counts, corrections, and confidence settings easily. View estimates, uncertainty, and downloadable summaries for reporting today.
| Group | Outcome present | Outcome absent | Total | Risk | Odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | 45 | 155 | 200 | 22.50% | 0.2903 |
| Comparison | 30 | 170 | 200 | 15.00% | 0.1765 |
| Example causal odds ratio = (45 × 170) ÷ (155 × 30) = 1.6452. | |||||
Causal OR = [P(Y1=1) / (1 − P(Y1=1))] ÷ [P(Y0=1) / (1 − P(Y0=1))]
Using a 2×2 table, OR = (a × d) ÷ (b × c), where a and c contain outcome counts, and b and d contain non-outcome counts.
ln(OR) ± z × √(1/a + 1/b + 1/c + 1/d), then exponentiate both bounds to return the interval on the odds ratio scale.
Risk difference = p1 − p0. Risk ratio = p1 ÷ p0. Attributable fraction = (p1 − p0) ÷ p1.
When any table cell is zero, continuity correction stabilizes the estimate by adding the selected correction value to each cell.
It compares the odds of an outcome under intervention versus comparison. Values above 1 suggest higher outcome odds with intervention, below 1 suggest lower odds, and 1 suggests no difference.
Probability measures the chance of an event out of all observations. Odds compare event frequency to non-event frequency. Odds can grow above 1 easily, while probabilities remain between 0 and 1.
Apply it when any 2×2 cell is zero or when you want a stabilized finite estimate. Adding a small value to each cell prevents division by zero and reduces extreme interval behavior.
It gives a plausible range for the population odds ratio under repeated sampling assumptions. Narrower intervals indicate greater precision, while wider intervals signal more uncertainty from smaller or imbalanced samples.
Odds ratios are useful, but risk ratio and risk difference often improve practical interpretation. Showing all three helps you compare relative change, absolute change, and odds-based change together.
Yes. The calculator accepts decimal values, which may represent weighted data, expected counts, or modeled frequencies. For purely observed tables, whole-number counts are usually easier to explain.
It multiplies the estimated risk difference by your chosen reference population. This provides an absolute projection of additional or prevented outcomes if the same effect held across that population size.
No. The calculator computes a causal-style contrast from supplied data. Valid causal interpretation still depends on study design, exchangeability, measurement quality, and appropriate adjustment for confounding.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.