Build reliable surveys with advanced sampling calculations. Review weights, precision, intervals, and method comparisons instantly. Get clear outputs for stronger statistical planning and decisions.
| Scenario | Population | Confidence | Expected Proportion | Margin Error | Design Effect | Response Rate | Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City household survey | 5,000 | 95% | 50% | 5% | 1.00 | 90% | Simple random |
| School enrollment study | 12,500 | 95% | 42% | 4% | 1.20 | 85% | Systematic |
| Regional health survey | 30,000 | 99% | 35% | 3% | 1.50 | 88% | Stratified |
| Village cluster study | 8,400 | 95% | 25% | 5% | 1.30 | 80% | Cluster |
1. Initial sample size for a proportion:
n₀ = (Z² × p × (1 - p)) / e²
2. Finite population correction:
n_fpc = n₀ / (1 + ((n₀ - 1) / N))
3. Design-adjusted completed sample:
n_design = n_fpc × DEFF
4. Draw needed after nonresponse:
n_draw = n_design / RR
5. Inclusion probability:
π = n_draw / N
6. Base weight:
w = 1 / π
7. Systematic sampling interval:
k = N / n_draw
8. Cluster design effect estimate:
DEFF_cluster = 1 + (m - 1) × ICC
9. Proportional stratified allocation:
n_h = n × (N_h / ΣN_h)
10. Neyman allocation:
n_h = n × (N_h × S_h / Σ(N_h × S_h))
It is the anticipated share of the population with the attribute of interest. If you do not know it, using 50% is conservative because it usually produces the largest required sample size.
When the sample is a meaningful share of the population, finite population correction reduces the needed sample size. It reflects the fact that sampling without replacement gives more information in smaller populations.
Use a larger design effect when your design is more complex than simple random sampling, such as clustering, unequal weights, or multistage sampling. It inflates the sample size to protect precision.
Inclusion probability is the chance that a unit enters the sample. It is central for weighting, because the inverse of that probability becomes the base sampling weight.
The interval tells you how far apart selected units should be. If the interval is 10, you pick a random start between 1 and 10, then select every 10th unit.
Neyman allocation places more sample in larger and more variable strata. It often improves efficiency compared with simple proportional allocation when stratum variability differs meaningfully.
Not everyone contacted will respond. The response rate inflates the number of units you need to draw so that your expected completed responses still meet the precision target.
No. It is a strong planning tool for common sampling decisions, but complex national surveys may still need specialized design software, frame analysis, and variance estimation procedures.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.