Design reliable inlets for heavy storm runoff today. Tune coefficients, depths, and grate geometry quickly. Export results, justify assumptions, and build safer drainage systems.
| Scenario | Area | C | Intensity | Ponding | Weir Length | Orifice |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial parking | 9,500 m² | 0.85 | 75 mm/hr | 0.10 m | 0.80 m | 150 mm Ø |
| Residential block | 4,200 m² | 0.55 | 60 mm/hr | 0.08 m | 0.60 m | 120 mm Ø |
| Industrial yard | 1.8 acres | 0.80 | 3.5 in/hr | 0.35 ft | 3.0 ft | 6 in Ø |
Catch basin sizing starts with the Rational Method peak flow. Use drainage area, runoff coefficient, and rainfall intensity from local IDF curves for the selected return period. For mixed surfaces, compute a weighted C. Higher intensities or larger areas increase peak runoff and can require more inlets or larger openings.
This calculator estimates capture with ponded flow using a weir component and an orifice component. The weir term grows with the 3/2 power of water depth, so small increases in allowable ponding can raise capacity noticeably. The orifice term depends on opening area and the square root of depth.
Field performance is reduced by debris, sediment, and partial blockage. Apply a clogging reduction to represent typical grate impairment, then apply a safety factor to cover uncertainty in intensity selection, surface changes, and flow concentration. Conservative projects often use 10–25% clogging and 1.10–1.25 safety factors.
Select coefficients that match your standard details. If bypass flow is allowed, compute remaining discharge to the next inlet. Use site grading to confirm that ponding depth is achievable without hazards.
After a required basin count is computed, spacing can be estimated by dividing available curb length by the number of basins. This supports preliminary layout, but final spacing must satisfy gutter spread, bypass flow, and roadway constraints. A simple storage volume check helps confirm sump capacity for sediment management.
Example (metric): A = 9,500 m², C = 0.85, i = 75 mm/hr gives Q ≈ 0.168 m³/s. With h = 0.10 m, L = 0.80 m, Cw = 1.70, and a 150 mm circular opening (Cd = 0.62), combined capacity is about 0.066 m³/s; with 15% clogging and SF 1.10, the layout suggests 4 basins.
Use the return period and duration required by your local drainage standard, then read intensity from IDF data for a duration near the time of concentration of the drainage area.
Select C based on surface type and slope. For mixed areas, compute a weighted average using each surface area fraction. Use local guidance when available.
Weir capture scales with h3/2 and orifice capture scales with √h, so even small allowable increases in depth can raise capture noticeably.
For preliminary design, 0.10–0.25 is common depending on debris load, maintenance, and grate type. Increase the value where leaf litter or sediment is expected.
Use combined when a grate provides both overflow edge capture and an opening below. Use weir-only for shallow edge capture and orifice-only when flow enters primarily through a defined opening.
No. It is a capacity-based estimate. Final layout should confirm gutter spread, allowable bypass flow, inlet throat effects, and roadway safety constraints per the applicable roadway drainage manual.
Export the input set, selected method, effective capacity after clogging, safety factor, and the resulting basin count. Include the example scenario and note any coefficients calibrated to standard details.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.