Turn field measurements into a clear fire rating. Spot weak points before inspections and bids. Use it to plan upgrades, not replace testing ever.
| Scenario | System | Thickness (mm) | Layers | Penetrations | Openings | Protection | Estimated (min) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Office Partition | Stud + board, mineral wool, basic stopping | 100 | 4 | 6 | 10% | 0 | ≈ 75 |
| Concrete Stair Core | Reinforced concrete | 150 | 0 | 2 | 0% | 0 | ≈ 180 |
| Mechanical Shaft Wall | Stud + board, good stopping, two-sided exposure | 125 | 6 | 18 | 5% | 0 | ≈ 120 |
| Steel Column Upgrade | Steel baseline with added protection | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 25 mm | ≈ 95 |
This calculator estimates fire resistance time (minutes) using a simple scoring model:
The model is intentionally transparent for quick comparison. Use tested assemblies and professional review for final decisions.
Early design teams often need a quick sense of how long a wall, slab, or protected steel member may resist fire exposure before detailed listings are selected. This estimate supports preliminary budgeting, coordination, and risk screening. For example, a 60 minute target can guide whether a typical partition should be upgraded with additional layers, improved stopping, or protection on a steel element. Use it during design and procurement planning.
The strongest drivers are material system, thickness, and continuity. Concrete and masonry generally gain minutes with added thickness, while stud-and-board assemblies rely heavily on total layers across exposed faces. Openings and penetrations reduce performance because they introduce weak paths for heat and smoke. Work quality and verified firestopping also matter, especially around boxes, sleeves, and joint intersections.
The calculator combines a base curve for the chosen material and thickness with additions for lining layers, insulation choice, and added protection thickness. It then subtracts penalties for penetrations, opening percentage, and uncertainty. The result is clamped to practical bounds and reported in minutes and hours. This transparent structure makes sensitivity checks easy: change one input and see the impact.
Set a target rating to compare the estimated minutes against a required level, such as 30, 60, 90, or 120 minutes. Add a safety margin when inputs are uncertain or workmanship varies; a 0.10 margin reduces the reported value by 10 percent. Use this feature to keep decisions conservative, especially when drawings change or MEP routing adds new penetrations.
This tool does not replace certified assemblies, lab tests, or local code review. Treat results as directional and document assumptions: thickness source, layer counts, penetration estimates, and firestopping scope. For higher confidence, align selections with tested systems and record product data sheets, detailing notes, and inspection photos. Exporting CSV and PDF helps maintain an auditable trail across revisions.
No. It is a planning estimate based on general behavior and continuity factors. Use listed, tested assemblies and local requirements for compliance and permitting.
Material system, thickness, and total lining layers have the biggest effect. Penetrations, openings, and poor firestopping can quickly reduce minutes, even when materials are upgraded.
Enter the total layers across all exposed faces. For two layers on each side of a partition, enter four layers in the field.
It reduces the reported minutes by a chosen percentage to stay conservative. Use a higher margin when access is limited, workmanship is uncertain, or the design is still changing.
Only as a rough indicator. Doors and glazed systems depend on specific listings, hardware, seals, and frame details. Always select products with tested ratings that match the required duration.
Record assumptions, drawings, product data sheets, and inspection notes. Track changes in penetrations and openings across revisions so the estimate remains comparable and auditable.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.