Calculator
Rate your alignment (0–10) and set weights. Weights are normalized to 100% automatically.
How to use
- Pick a target role and seniority.
- Rate each dimension from 0 to 10.
- Set weights to reflect what matters most.
- Submit to view score, gaps, and next steps.
- Re-run after improving gaps or changing priorities.
Formula used
Fit Score is a weighted average converted to a 0–100 scale:
Fit = Σ (Ratingᵢ / 10) × Weightᵢ
Gap impact estimates prioritize items with high weight and low rating.
Example data table
Sample role fits for quick comparison. Use downloads if you need to share.
| Role | Industry | Fit Score | Top Gap | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product Analyst | Technology | 78.5 | Domain Knowledge | Build industry metrics glossary |
| Security Analyst | Finance | 64.0 | Tools & Tech Fit | Complete SIEM lab project |
| Operations Manager | Logistics | 71.2 | Work Style | Improve stakeholder cadence |
| UX Researcher | Healthcare | 82.1 | Compensation Alignment | Benchmark pay and refine targets |
What the fit score represents
The calculator converts your self‑ratings into a weighted fit score from 0 to 100. Each dimension is scored on a 0–10 scale, then multiplied by its importance weight. Scores near 80+ suggest strong alignment for the selected role and level, while 50–65 often signals partial alignment with clear improvement opportunities. If the role is unfamiliar, start conservative and adjust after interviews or trial projects. Use consistent scoring criteria across roles to stay objective.
How weighting improves realism
Not every requirement matters equally. A technical role may prioritize tools and skills over location, while a people‑leader role may emphasize work style and values. This analyzer normalizes weights to 100%, so you can stress what matters most and see how priorities change the outcome when comparing roles.
Interpreting gap impact
Gap impact highlights where improvement can lift your score fastest. The tool estimates impact by combining a low rating with a high weight, producing a “points at risk” view. Use the top three gaps to create a focused plan for the next 30–60 days, with simple weekly targets. For each gap, set one deliverable, a deadline, and a validation method, such as a mock task or mentor review.
Evidence that strengthens your ratings
Ratings are most useful when backed by proof: projects, portfolio links, certifications, peer feedback, and measurable results such as time saved, defects reduced, or customer satisfaction improved. Documenting evidence reduces bias and makes comparisons across industries or seniority levels more consistent.
Using results for career planning
Combine the score with a short action backlog. Pick one capability gap, one proof item, and one networking step per week. Track progress and rerun the analyzer after milestones. Improving high‑weight gaps and building evidence can shift a “Moderate” fit into a “Strong” fit over time.
FAQs
How accurate is the fit score?
It is a structured self‑assessment. Accuracy improves when ratings use evidence like projects, feedback, and measurable outcomes, and when weights reflect true role priorities.
Do weights need to total 100%?
No. You can enter any non‑negative numbers. The calculator automatically normalizes them so the final weights sum to 100% for consistent scoring.
What score range is considered a good fit?
As a guideline, 80+ is excellent alignment, 65–79 is strong, 50–64 is moderate, and below 50 signals meaningful gaps to address.
Why does the tool show top improvement targets?
It prioritizes areas with high importance and low ratings. Improving these gaps typically increases your overall score faster than working on low‑weight items.
How should I compare two roles?
Run the analyzer twice with role‑specific weights and ratings. Compare fit score, top gaps, and next steps, then choose the path with clearer improvements and stronger evidence.
Can I share results with a mentor or recruiter?
Yes. Use the CSV or PDF export to share the breakdown and discuss strengths, priorities, and a targeted improvement plan.