Calculator
Example data table
| Scenario | Key terms | Typical outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Startup demo NDA | 2-year term, 3-year survival, moderate carveouts, no restrictive covenants | Moderate |
| Vendor security NDA | 5-year term, strict security, audit rights, limited disclosures, injunctive relief | High |
| Strategic partner NDA | 7-year survival, unilateral, non-compete, liquidated damages, prohibited sharing | Critical |
Use examples as reference only; real risk depends on wording and jurisdiction.
Formula used
This calculator converts NDA terms into a 0–100 risk score using a weighted sum:
Risk Score = Σ (Weighti × NormalizedFactori)
- Each factor is normalized to a 0–1 range, then multiplied by its weight.
- Weights emphasize term length, survival, restrictive covenants, and remedies.
- Longer durations, stricter sharing, and stronger remedies increase risk points.
How to use this calculator
- Enter the NDA’s term, survival period, and key clause settings.
- Move the sliders to reflect how broad or strict wording feels.
- Press Submit to see the score and breakdown.
- Download CSV or PDF to share with your team.
- Use the breakdown to target negotiation priorities.
This tool is educational and not legal advice.
Term duration signals
Term and survival periods control how long duties apply. Longer timelines raise monitoring costs. They also extend exposure to mistakes. In many business NDAs, terms cluster near 12–36 months. Survival commonly ranges 24–60 months. Use this calculator to compare options quickly.
Definition breadth impacts
A broad definition can cover emails, notes, and derived work. That scope increases compliance effort. It also raises dispute risk. Narrow definitions can reduce false claims. Clear marking rules help. Add a practical standard for oral disclosures.
Disclosure controls and carveouts
Permitted disclosures should match real operations. Common needs include advisers and affiliates. A strict list can block normal work. Strong carveouts reduce overreach. Typical carveouts include public information, prior knowledge, and independent development. A lawful order process is also important.
Remedies and liability pressure
Injunctive relief increases urgency in disputes. Liquidated damages can raise financial exposure. These clauses often shift leverage. A balanced limitation of liability can reduce tail risk. Pair remedies with clear breach thresholds. Add cure steps when possible.
Operational obligations
Security and audit terms drive ongoing cost. High security levels may require access controls and logging. Audit rights can add disruption. Return and destruction clauses can be hard with backups. Consider reasonable timelines. Allow retention for legal compliance when needed.
Using the score in negotiation
Use the breakdown to target high-point drivers. Shorten term length when practical. Improve carveouts for normal use. Allow limited residuals for memory. Reduce restrictive covenants in pure NDAs. Align forum and law to minimize friction. Export the report for review workflows.
FAQs
Does a higher score mean the NDA is unenforceable?
No. The score estimates operational and negotiation risk. Enforceability depends on wording, facts, and local law. Use the score to spot pressure points and improve clarity.
How are term and survival treated?
The calculator converts both to months. Term risk caps near five years. Survival risk caps near seven years. Longer values still matter, but they do not push the score beyond the cap.
What does “definition breadth” represent?
It approximates how widely the NDA labels information as confidential. A broad definition increases compliance work. It can also expand dispute scope. Use the slider based on real wording.
Why do restrictive covenants raise risk?
Non-solicit and non-compete terms can limit hiring or sales. They often create business friction. Some jurisdictions restrict them. Even when valid, they increase the cost of compliance and review.
Can I change the weights?
This version uses fixed weights for consistency. If you want editable weights, tell me your preferred factors and ranges. I can add a weight panel and recalculate dynamically.
Is this legal advice?
No. It is an educational scoring tool. Use it to compare drafts and document concerns. For signing decisions, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction.