Plan correlation studies with flexible statistical controls. Review power curves, thresholds, and scenario comparisons instantly. Make confident design choices before collecting any expensive data.
| Scenario | Expected r | n | Alpha | Tail test | Approx. Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer sentiment and retention study | 0.30 | 85 | 0.05 | Two-tailed | 0.8003 |
| Biomarker and response screening | 0.25 | 120 | 0.05 | Two-tailed | 0.7889 |
| Engagement pilot correlation check | 0.35 | 60 | 0.05 | Two-tailed | 0.7879 |
This calculator uses a Fisher z approximation for planning and power estimation in correlation studies. It is practical for design decisions and fast scenario testing.
Fisher transformation: zr = 0.5 × ln((1 + r) / (1 - r))
Shift parameter: δ = √(n - 3) × zr
Two-tailed power: 1 − Φ(zcrit − δ) + Φ(−zcrit − δ)
One-tailed power: 1 − Φ(zcrit − δ) for positive alternatives
Critical threshold: |rcrit| ≈ tanh(zcrit / √(n − 3))
Here, Φ denotes the standard normal cumulative distribution function. The method assumes independent observations and a design where Fisher’s z approximation is reasonable for planning.
It estimates statistical power for a correlation study, the minimum sample size needed for a target power, or the smallest correlation likely to be detectable with a chosen sample size.
Fisher z stabilizes the sampling behavior of correlation coefficients and makes power planning much easier. It is widely used for approximate study design and scenario comparisons.
Use a one-tailed test only when your hypothesis has a justified direction before seeing data. If both positive and negative associations matter, two-tailed testing is safer.
A target power of 0.80 is common. Higher targets such as 0.90 reduce the chance of missing a real effect, but they usually require larger sample sizes.
Yes. Negative values are supported. For one-tailed settings, direction affects power. For two-tailed settings, the magnitude matters most when assessing detectability.
No. These are planning approximations based on the Fisher z framework. They are useful for study design, but exact small-sample behavior can differ from the approximation.
Small samples usually give unstable correlation estimates and weaker power. That can increase false negatives and make effect sizes appear more volatile than expected.
Use prior literature, domain benchmarks, pilot results, or a conservative practical minimum. Overstating the expected effect can produce unrealistically small sample size recommendations.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.