Measure material loss with flexible engineering inputs. See wear depth, specific wear rate, and coefficient. Use clear formulas, examples, graphs, exports, and practical guidance.
Use direct volume loss or mass-based inputs. The page stays single-column overall, while fields adapt by screen size.
These sample rows are illustrative engineering cases for comparing wear behavior under different operating conditions.
| Case | Material | Load (N) | Distance (m) | Volume Loss (mm³) | Specific Wear Rate (mm³/N·m) | Wear Depth (µm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hardened steel pin | 120 | 2500 | 15.30 | 0.000051 | 102.00 |
| 2 | Aluminum alloy | 90 | 1800 | 26.80 | 0.000165 | 178.70 |
| 3 | Bronze bushing | 75 | 2200 | 12.60 | 0.000076 | 84.00 |
| 4 | Polymer composite | 40 | 1500 | 9.90 | 0.000165 | 220.00 |
V = Δm / ρ
V is volume loss, Δm is mass loss, and ρ is density.
Wear rate = V / L
This gives material lost per unit sliding distance.
ks = V / (F × L)
F is normal load and L is sliding distance.
h = V / A
A is nominal contact area.
Linear wear rate = h / t
t is total test time.
K = ks × H
H is material hardness expressed as pressure. This estimate is useful when Archard assumptions reasonably apply.
Wear rate describes how quickly material is removed during contact and motion. It is usually expressed as volume loss per distance, or volume loss per load and distance.
Use direct volume loss when profilometry, microscopy, or geometric measurements already gave the removed volume. This avoids density conversion and reduces uncertainty from mass measurement noise.
Mass loss alone does not show removed volume. Density converts lost mass into lost volume, which is needed for wear rate, specific wear rate, and wear depth calculations.
Specific wear rate normalizes volume loss by both load and sliding distance. It helps compare materials, coatings, or test conditions more fairly across different experiments.
No. The calculator estimates wear depth from removed volume divided by contact area. Real scars may be uneven, so measured profiles can differ from the nominal depth result.
Hardness is only needed when estimating the Archard wear coefficient. The other outputs, including wear rate, specific wear rate, and wear depth, do not require it.
Yes. The calculator converts all supported inputs to consistent SI values internally. That keeps the engineering outputs comparable even when your source data uses different units.
The graph assumes steady wear over the test distance. Contact pressure and wear depth are nominal values, so complex geometry, transfer films, and transient regimes may need deeper analysis.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.