Understanding Cascade Impactor Calculations
Cascade impactor studies convert collected drug into particle size results. HPLC supplies assay response for each stage. The calculator links both steps. It converts peak area into concentration. It then converts concentration into mass.
Why The Method Matters
Inhaled products need controlled particle size. Large droplets may stop in the throat. Very small particles may be exhaled. The fine particle dose often shows the respirable fraction. MMAD describes the median aerodynamic size. GSD shows spread across stages. Together, these values support development, release testing, and comparison work.
Using HPLC Stage Assay Data
Each stage extract normally has a chromatogram. The response is corrected with a calibration slope and intercept. A blank response can also be removed. The corrected concentration is multiplied by extract volume and dilution. Recovery and purity corrections can be applied. The result is the drug mass collected on each stage.
Particle Size Interpretation
Stage cut-off diameters must be entered in descending order. Early entries may represent the induction port or preseparator. These can use zero cut-off values. The calculator treats valid positive cut-offs as sizing stages. For every cut-off, it calculates the mass found downstream. This estimates the percentage of particles smaller than that diameter.
Quality Checks
A useful study has balanced recovery. The recovered dose should match the expected drug amount. Poor recovery may indicate extraction loss, transfer loss, or method error. Large throat deposition may show formulation or device issues. High fine particle fraction often means more respirable material. Yet results must be judged with the product method.
Best Use
Enter data from validated HPLC tables. Keep units consistent. Use micrograms per milliliter for concentration. Use milliliters for extraction volume. Check stage order before interpreting MMAD. Review the generated table before exporting. The CSV and PDF buttons help retain a compact record. Always compare results with approved laboratory procedures and acceptance limits.
Common Inputs
Common inputs include peak areas, calibration slope, intercept, blank area, dilution factor, extract volume, recovery, and purity. The expected dose field helps judge recovery. The fine particle cut-off can match the method. Many reports use five micrometers. Some compendial methods use another limit. Document the choice clearly for review. Record instrument settings with each tested sample set.