Turn applicant volume into a clear interview metric. Filter by role, period, and department instantly. Download CSV or PDF and share performance insights fast.
| Role | Applications | Invites | Invite Rate | Source | Department |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales Development Rep | 320 | 48 | 15.00% | Job board | Sales |
| Data Analyst | 180 | 18 | 10.00% | Career site | Analytics |
| Product Designer | 140 | 14 | 10.00% | Referral | Product |
| IT Support Specialist | 220 | 22 | 10.00% | Agency | Operations |
The calculator reports the percentage of applications that received an interview invitation.
Interview invite rate connects sourcing volume to pipeline quality. If 500 applications yield 25 invites, the rate is 5%. Track it to spot screening bottlenecks, and segment by role family to avoid averaging unlike funnels. When rate drops while application volume rises, recruiters often face more unqualified traffic.
Targets should reflect market, seniority, and assessment depth. High-volume roles might run 3–8%, while niche technical searches can exceed 10–20% because applicants self-select. Use the calculator’s target field to flag “below”, “on track”, or “above” quickly. Recalibrate targets when you change job ads or add knockout questions.
Small samples swing wildly: 3 invites out of 20 is 15%, but one more invite changes it to 20%. The 95% range helps you avoid overreacting; wider ranges mean less certainty. Wilson range stays stable near 0% and 100%. Compare teams only when their ranges overlap minimally, and consider combining two weeks to stabilize estimates for low-volume roles.
Pair invite rate with qualified-application counts and rejection reasons. If qualified volume is high yet invites are low, the issue is interviewer capacity or slow scheduling. If qualified volume is low, adjust sourcing channels, tighten requirements, or rewrite the description. Add a review SLA, such as “screen within 48 hours”, and audit adherence. Measure invites per day to validate whether changes speed up decisions.
Report invite rate alongside time windows and sources. A channel that produces 40% of applicants but only 10% of invites is likely low quality. Export CSV to build a monthly dashboard, and attach the PDF to hiring-manager updates. Track a rolling four-week rate to smooth seasonality and hiring spikes. Over time, aim for stable rates and shrinking confidence ranges.
Use total for top-of-funnel health and sourcing quality. Use qualified when your team pre-screens and you want a consistent comparison of recruiter and interviewer throughput.
Count invitations that schedule or attempt to schedule a structured interview stage you track consistently, such as phone screen, onsite, or panel. Exclude informal chats unless you treat them as a stage.
Two teams can show the same rate but different certainty. Smaller samples create wider ranges, so changes may be noise. Use the range to decide when a shift is meaningful enough to act on.
Start with your historical median by role, then adjust for changes in sourcing channels, requirements, or assessment steps. Keep targets stable for a quarter so trends are comparable and coaching is focused.
Confirm the date range and that invites were logged promptly. If correct, check reviewer capacity, scheduling delays, or approval steps. A low daily pace often points to process friction, not sourcing volume.
Improve job ad clarity, add knockout questions, and prioritize channels that yield qualified applicants. Standardize screening rubrics and train reviewers. Track qualified rate and offer acceptance to ensure quality stays intact.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.