Study estimated penetration with slope and range effects. Check effective armor normalization and survivability trends. Clean charts guide stronger vehicle choices during every match.
The chart compares estimated shell penetration against the target’s calculated effective armor across distance.
| Shell | Base Pen | Range | Armor | Angle | Effective Armor | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APCBC | 185 mm | 500 m | 120 mm | 55° | 195.2 mm | Marginal |
| APCR | 230 mm | 800 m | 150 mm | 45° | 223.4 mm | Possible |
| HEAT-FS | 320 mm | 1000 m | 180 mm | 60° | 387.0 mm | Weak |
| APFSDS | 410 mm | 1500 m | 220 mm | 68° | 560.1 mm | Unlikely |
| AP | 145 mm | 300 m | 90 mm | 35° | 114.8 mm | Strong |
1) Range-adjusted penetration: Penetration at range = Base penetration × range factor.
2) Range factor: For longer range, factor = 1 / (1 + decay × distance step). Shorter range applies a small capped bonus.
3) Applied normalization: Effective normalization = shell normalization + overmatch bonus.
4) Adjusted angle: Adjusted angle = armor angle − applied normalization.
5) Effective base armor: Effective armor = adjusted armor thickness ÷ cos(adjusted angle).
6) Total effective armor: Total effective armor = effective base armor + spaced armor penalty.
7) Margin: Penetration margin = penetration at range − total effective armor.
8) Estimated chance: A logistic-style score converts the margin into a readable probability, then reduces it when ricochet risk increases.
No. It gives a structured estimate. Specific vehicles, shells, plates, and updates can behave differently. Use it for planning and quick comparisons, not exact replay-level prediction.
Sloped armor increases the path length through the plate. That raises effective armor and can also push the shell toward ricochet territory.
Normalization reduces the effective impact angle for capped or stable shells. That makes steep armor slightly less punishing than the raw slope number suggests.
APCR usually has weaker normalization and stronger sensitivity to slope. It can look strong on flat armor yet struggle badly once the target angles the plate.
It represents energy loss or disruption before the main plate. Chemical rounds and some sub-caliber rounds can be affected differently, so the penalty changes by shell type.
It compares shell diameter to plate thickness. A larger ratio can reduce ricochet issues and slightly improve how the shell handles angled armor.
Armor values do not change with distance in this model. The shell loses or maintains penetration, while the target plate remains the same reference obstacle.
No. This page is for game-style estimation only. Real ballistic analysis depends on materials, velocity curves, metallurgy, shell construction, and controlled testing data.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.