A Priori Power Planning for Physics
Why power matters
A priori power calculation is used before a physics experiment starts. It helps estimate how many observations are needed to detect a planned effect. This matters when a laboratory run is costly, slow, or limited by equipment time. A clear power target also protects weak studies from being too small.
Inputs used by the calculator
The calculator uses a normal approximation for common planning cases. You can plan a one sample mean test, paired measurement test, two group mean comparison, or correlation study. Enter alpha, target power, tails, design effect, and an expected effect. For mean based work, you may enter a standardized effect directly. You may also enter an expected physical difference and a standard deviation. The tool then derives the standardized effect.
Physics examples
In physics, the expected effect may be a change in voltage, decay rate, temperature, resistance, pressure, or detector response. The standard deviation should match the same unit. A small standard deviation increases sensitivity. A larger standard deviation requires more observations. Two tailed tests need stronger evidence than one tailed tests. That usually increases the required sample size.
Design effect and attrition
Design effect is useful when measurements are not fully independent. Repeated readings from one device, shared batches, or clustered samples can reduce effective information. Use one for independent measurements. Use a larger value when clustering is expected. Attrition adjusts the planned sample upward. It is helpful when sensor failures, unusable samples, or missing readings are likely.
Using results responsibly
The achieved power mode checks an existing plan. It estimates whether a proposed sample can detect the chosen effect. The minimum detectable effect mode works backward. It shows the smallest standardized effect that a fixed sample can detect at the selected power. These modes help compare practical limits with scientific goals.
Results are planning estimates, not guarantees. Real experiments may violate assumptions. Distribution shape, unequal variances, calibration drift, and systematic error can change performance. Treat the output as an early design guide. Then combine it with pilot data, domain knowledge, and a written analysis plan. Good planning makes physics studies clearer. It also makes resource requests easier to defend. Keep notes beside each exported report.